USPTO serial 79220385
CHAIR BALL
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 402
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CANTOR, JILLIAN REDDING
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 137
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with CHAIR BALL?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 028 | Kendo wooden swords; basketballs; dumb-bell shafts (for weight lifting); rackets; bar-bells; volleyballs; shuttlecocks; boxing gloves; punching bags; dumb-bells; baseball gloves; exercisers (expanders); jump ropes; gym balls; benches for physical training; footballs; table tennis rackets; tennis balls | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 1, 2026 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Jul 26, 2019 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jul 9, 2019 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 9, 2019 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 26, 2019 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Apr 10, 2019 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 10, 2019 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 9, 2018 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 9, 2018 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 18, 2018 | UNDN | UNDELIVERABLE MAIL - NO ACTION TAKEN | — |
| Dec 23, 2017 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Dec 4, 2017 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 4, 2017 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Nov 21, 2017 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Nov 21, 2017 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Nov 20, 2017 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 17, 2017 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 17, 2017 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Nov 14, 2017 | LIMI | LIMITATION FROM ORIGINAL APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Nov 9, 2017 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |