Drawing for FRICTION FACTS

USPTO serial 79220449

FRICTION FACTS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 5677198Status 707Registered
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Feb 19, 2019
Examiner
POLZER, NATALIE M
Law office
Historical data usage

What this means

This trademark is registered with the USPTO. Monitoring new filings can help you catch lookalike marks early.

Need help with FRICTION FACTS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Eric T. Fingerhut

Eric T. Fingerhut Dykema Gossett PLLC1301 K Street, N.W., Suite 1100 WestWashington, DC 20005United States

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
012[ Parts and fittings for land vehicles, namely, pulley wheels and anti-friction bearings for bicycles; ball bearings for land vehicles, namely, ceramic bearings; axle ball bearings for land vehicles; pulley wheels for land vehicles; bicycles; parts of bicycles, namely, gears for bicycles; bicycle construction parts, namely, forks, handle bar stems, brakes; bicycle wheels; bicycle chains; bicycle parts, namely, bottom brackets; gear wheels for bicycles; rear derailleurs ]SECTION 71 - CANCELLED—
042Scientific and technological services, namely, research, design and testing in the field of bicycle components; industrial analysis and research in the field of bicycle componentsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 15, 2026XXSSGENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION SENT TO IB—
Oct 15, 2026XXCRGENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION CREATED—
Feb 10, 2026INPRPARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
Jun 10, 2025NA71NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED—
Jun 10, 202571.PREGISTERED - PARTIAL SEC 71 ACCEPTED—
Jun 9, 2025APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Feb 19, 2025ES71TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED—
Jul 5, 2019FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Jun 14, 2019FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Jun 14, 2019FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
May 19, 2019FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Feb 19, 2019R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Dec 4, 2018PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Nov 30, 2018GPNXNOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB—
Nov 14, 2018OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Nov 14, 2018OP2RNOTICE OF START OF OPPOSITION PERIOD CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Nov 14, 2018NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Nov 1, 2018PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Oct 31, 2018CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Oct 30, 2018TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Oct 30, 2018CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 30, 2018TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Sep 5, 2018CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 5, 2018CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 20, 2018TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Aug 20, 2018CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 15, 2018ERSITEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED—
Feb 22, 2018CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Feb 21, 2018CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Feb 5, 2018TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Feb 5, 2018CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 31, 2018ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jan 22, 2018TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 23, 2017RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Dec 1, 2017RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Dec 1, 2017RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Nov 21, 2017MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Nov 18, 2017RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Nov 17, 2017CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 15, 2017DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 15, 2017NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Nov 9, 2017REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance