USPTO serial 79220531
LINGSTER
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SWAIN, MICHELE LYNN
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 116 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with LINGSTER?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 016 | Books | ACTIVE | — |
| 038 | Providing voice communication services over the internet; providing voice chat services; voice transmission services; communication by online blogs; on-line communication services; transmission of information on-line; providing access to multimedia content online; providing online chatrooms for the transmission of messages, comments and multimedia content among users; providing online forums; providing user access to a global computer network and online sites containing information on a wide range of topics; video uploading services electronic transmission; transmission of audio data via the internet | ACTIVE | — |
| 041 | Language courses; language tuition; remedial tuition in language; language tuition; organisation of language courses; education academy services for teaching languages; language tuition; translation and interpretation; provision of language schools and language courses; education services for imparting language teaching methods; language tuition; providing electronic publications relating to language training, not downloadable; on-line gaming services; provision of on-line computer games; webinars for education purposes; publication of instructional literature; publication of instructional literature; publication of text books; distance learning services provided online; provision of online tutorials; provision of online training; providing on-line videos, not downloadable; coaching; on-line publishing services; providing on-line publications; publication of multimedia material online; teacher training services; providing on-line music, not downloadable; provision of education information relating to books; remedial tuition for speaking; providing online training seminars; school services for the teaching of languages; provision of online information relating to audio and video training; video production services | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 2, 2019 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jul 18, 2019 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 18, 2019 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 26, 2019 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Apr 10, 2019 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 10, 2019 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 18, 2018 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 18, 2018 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 23, 2017 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Dec 6, 2017 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 6, 2017 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Nov 22, 2017 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Nov 21, 2017 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 21, 2017 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Nov 16, 2017 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 16, 2017 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Nov 9, 2017 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |