USPTO serial 79220578
OLD STREET BAK KUT TEH
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 5488984Status 709
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jun 12, 2018
- Examiner
- VAGHANI, MAYUR C
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 124
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with OLD STREET BAK KUT TEH?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Robert B. Burlingame
Robert B. Burlingame Amplitude IP182 Howard Street, #2Calendar/Docketing DepartmentSan Francisco, CA 94105Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 043 | Restaurant and coffee shop services; services for providing food and drinks; provision of food and drinks in a food court, cafe, coffee shop, food outlet, food kiosk, restaurant, snack bar, take-away counter or outlet, self service cafe, self service restaurant and self service stall; food preparation for catering services; consultancy of food and drinks preparation; information and advisory service relating to the aforesaid | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Old Street Bak Kut Teh Pte. Ltd.
- Other trademarks owned by Old Street Bak Kut Teh Pte. Ltd.
- Other trademarks owned by Old Street Bak Kut Teh Pte. Ltd.
- Other trademarks in Class 043
- Similar marks named OLD STREET BAK KUT TEH
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 26, 2026 | INNT | TOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Feb 12, 2026 | INTS | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 12, 2026 | INPC | INVALIDATION PROCESSED | — |
| Aug 27, 2025 | INTR | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Dec 27, 2024 | C71T | CANCELLED SECTION 71 | — |
| Jun 12, 2023 | REM3 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 13, 2020 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 13, 2020 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| May 2, 2019 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 18, 2019 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 6, 2018 | FINV | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Sep 17, 2018 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 17, 2018 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Sep 12, 2018 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 21, 2018 | COC. | CORRECTION UNDER SECTION 7 - PROCESSED | — |
| Jun 21, 2018 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jun 20, 2018 | CORR | CORRECTION FROM IB ENTERED - NO REVIEW REQUIRED | — |
| Jun 12, 2018 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jun 1, 2018 | CRCV | CORRECTION TRANSACTION RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Mar 30, 2018 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Mar 27, 2018 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 27, 2018 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 7, 2018 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 20, 2018 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 20, 2018 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 19, 2018 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 19, 2018 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 8, 2018 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 8, 2018 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 8, 2018 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 12, 2018 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 12, 2018 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 12, 2018 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 23, 2017 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Dec 6, 2017 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 6, 2017 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Nov 22, 2017 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Nov 21, 2017 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 21, 2017 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Nov 17, 2017 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 17, 2017 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Nov 9, 2017 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |