USPTO serial 79220605
MAXIS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 5563179Status 739Registered
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Sep 18, 2018
- Examiner
- FITZSIMONS, MICHAEL R
- Law office
- Historical data usage
What this means
This trademark is registered with the USPTO. Monitoring new filings can help you catch lookalike marks early.
Need help with MAXIS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
AU
AU
AU
AU
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Michael J. Nickerson
Michael J. Nickerson Dawson Law Firm, P.C.1844 Penfield RoadPenfield, NY 14526UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 006 | Joints predominantly made of metal, namely, joints for use within poles such as light poles, cctv poles, and telecommunication poles; metal swivelling joints for poles; couplings made predominantly of metal, namely, couplings for use within poles such as light poles, cctv poles, and telecommunication poles; poles made of metal incorporating joints including swivelling joints; joints predominantly made of metal for raising and lowering poles such as light poles, cctv poles, and telecommunication poles | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Koekstone IP Pty Ltd
- Other trademarks owned by Swivelpole Patent Pty Ltd
- Other trademarks owned by Swivelpole Patent Pty Ltd
- Other trademarks owned by Swivelpole Patent Pty Ltd
- Other trademarks in Class 006
- Similar marks named MAXIS
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 31, 2024 | NA75 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| May 31, 2024 | C75A | REGISTERED - SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| May 29, 2024 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Oct 4, 2023 | ES75 | TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 15, 2019 | CHLD | CHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Jan 17, 2019 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Dec 31, 2018 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 31, 2018 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Dec 18, 2018 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 18, 2018 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jul 3, 2018 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 13, 2018 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| May 29, 2018 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 24, 2018 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 24, 2018 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 24, 2018 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 7, 2018 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 6, 2018 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 27, 2018 | RFNP | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jan 23, 2018 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 22, 2018 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 22, 2018 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 8, 2018 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 8, 2018 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Dec 19, 2017 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Dec 18, 2017 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 8, 2017 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 21, 2017 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Nov 17, 2017 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Nov 16, 2017 | LIMI | LIMITATION FROM ORIGINAL APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Nov 9, 2017 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |