Drawing for COPOROC

USPTO serial 79220639

COPOROC

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 5494713Status 739Registered
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Jun 19, 2018
Examiner
CARLYLE, SHAUNIA P
Law office
GENERIC WEB UPDATE

What this means

This trademark is registered with the USPTO. Monitoring new filings can help you catch lookalike marks early.

Need help with COPOROC?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Andy I. Corea

Andy I. Corea Murtha Cullina LLP265 Church StreetNew Haven, CT 06510UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
001Clarifying agents for use in the manufacturing of seasonings or condiments, namely, soy sauce, unrefined soy sauce, fish sauce or vinegar; clarifying agents for use in the manufacturing of liquor, namely, Sake, Japanese Shochu-based mixed liquor (Mirin), wine, liquor flavored with Japanese plum extracts, liqueurs, cooking sake, or alcoholic fruit extracts; filtering clarificants made of silicon dioxide; clarifying agents for seasonings or condiments, namely, soy sauce, unrefined soy sauce, fish sauce or vinegar; clarifying agents for liquor, namely, Sake, Japanese Shochu-based mixed liquor (Mirin), wine, liquor flavored with Japanese plum extracts, liqueurs, cooking sake, or alcoholic fruit extracts; chemical preparations in the nature of filtering materials in food or liquor production industry; chemical agents for clarifying for seasonings or condiments, namely, soy sauce, unrefined soy sauce, fish sauce or vinegar; chemical agents for clarifying for liquor, namely, Sake, Japanese Shochu-based mixed liquor (Mirin), wine, liquor flavored with Japanese plum extracts, liqueurs, cooking sake, or alcoholic fruit extractsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 5, 2024NA75NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED—
Apr 5, 2024C75AREGISTERED - SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK.—
Apr 1, 2024APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Jul 21, 2023ES75TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED—
Jun 19, 2023REM3COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (6-YR) E-MAILED—
Oct 12, 2018FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Sep 22, 2018FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Sep 22, 2018FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Sep 19, 2018FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Jun 19, 2018R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Apr 3, 2018NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Apr 3, 2018PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Mar 14, 2018NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Feb 24, 2018CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Feb 2, 2018TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Feb 2, 2018CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 2, 2018TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 23, 2017RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Dec 4, 2017RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Dec 4, 2017RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Nov 21, 2017RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Nov 21, 2017MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Nov 20, 2017CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 17, 2017DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 17, 2017NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Nov 9, 2017REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance