USPTO serial 79220653
SMART CELL PROCESSING
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BLAZICH, JOAN MICHELE
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 122 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with SMART CELL PROCESSING?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 010 | Medical apparatus for cell culture; medical apparatus and instruments for use in cell culture, and parts and fittings therefor; apparatus for the regeneration of stem cells for medical purposes; medical apparatus and instruments for use in collection, transport and delivery of cells in the field of regenerative medicine; medical apparatus and instruments for cell analysis; medical apparatus and instruments | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Testing, inspection, analysis and research services in the field of cell and tissue culture; testing, inspection, analysis and research services in the fields of pharmaceuticals, cosmetics and foodstuffs; clinical trials; scientific services relating to the isolation and cultivation of human tissues and cells; cell culture for others; research, product development and quality control in the field of proteins, antibodies, microorganisms and cells, and consultancy relating thereto; quality testing services; quality testing; quality assessment; providing quality assurance services; quality testing of products for certification purposes; quality control services for certification purposes; scientific and medical research and development; design and development of medical apparatus for cell culture; designing of machines, apparatus, instruments including their parts or systems composed of such machines, apparatus and instruments; computer programming; rental of computer software; cloud computing; rental of computers; providing computer programs on data networks | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 2, 2019 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jul 16, 2019 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 16, 2019 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 26, 2019 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Apr 10, 2019 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 10, 2019 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 16, 2018 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 16, 2018 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 19, 2018 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Dec 14, 2017 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 14, 2017 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Dec 5, 2017 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Dec 4, 2017 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 27, 2017 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 24, 2017 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Nov 20, 2017 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Nov 9, 2017 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |