USPTO serial 79220816
STEASHIELD
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 5567723Status 709
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Sep 25, 2018
- Examiner
- PODESTA, GIDETTE
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with STEASHIELD?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Virginia L. Carron
Virginia L. Carron Finnegan901 New York Avenue NWWashington, DC 20001-4413UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | Chemicals and minerals for use in industry, namely, clay, talc, magnesium silicate and chlorite; minerals for use in industry, namely, clay, talc, magnesium silicate and chlorite; chemical preparations for use in the manufacture of paints, pigments, coatings and resins; mineral substances in the nature of barrier materials, namely, minerals used as an additive in paints, pigments, coatings, resins, varnishes and lacquers; minerals used as a filler in plastics, paints, pigments, coatings, resins, varnishes and lacquers being chemical compounds used in the manufacture of paints; unprocessed artificial resins; unprocessed plastics | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 23, 2026 | INNT | TOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Jul 4, 2026 | INTS | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 4, 2026 | INPC | INVALIDATION PROCESSED | — |
| Dec 11, 2025 | INTR | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Apr 11, 2025 | C71T | CANCELLED SECTION 71 | — |
| Sep 25, 2023 | REM3 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 25, 2022 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 1, 2019 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 25, 2019 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jan 9, 2019 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 9, 2019 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Dec 25, 2018 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 25, 2018 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jul 20, 2018 | GPNX | NOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jul 10, 2018 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 10, 2018 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 4, 2018 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 4, 2018 | OP2R | NOTICE OF START OF OPPOSITION PERIOD CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 20, 2018 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 7, 2018 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 6, 2018 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 6, 2018 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 6, 2018 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 23, 2017 | RFNP | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Dec 6, 2017 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 6, 2017 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Nov 25, 2017 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Nov 22, 2017 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Nov 21, 2017 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 21, 2017 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 21, 2017 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Nov 16, 2017 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |