Drawing for CATTIER PARIS

USPTO serial 79220847

CATTIER PARIS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
MAIHOS, JESSIE ANDREA
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 121 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 602: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with CATTIER PARIS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
003Cosmetics, namely, facial scrub products, skin cleansing exfoliants; facial care preparations; beauty masks; make-up removing gels, lotion, milk and cream; cleansing water, water for cosmetic use, cleansing solutions for cosmetic use; wipes impregnated with make-up removing preparations; tissues impregnated with cosmetic lotions; wipes impregnated with a skin cleanser; moisturizing milks; facial serums; facial cream; moisturizing facial creams; body and skin care milks; non-medicated lip balm; cosmetic oils; cosmetic hand-creams; moisturizing body creams and soaps; soaps; shower gels for the body; shampoos; hair-conditioning products; hair care masks; hair lotions; hair coloring products; non-medicated cleansing products for intimate use; cleansing wipes for feminine hygiene; deodorants for personal use; sun-protection oils, lotions, creams and milks; after-sun oils, lotions, gels, creams and milks; sunscreen preparations cosmetics with protection factor in the form of sprays; depilatory products; age-spot reduction creams; dentifrices and mouthwashes; tooth-whitening products; after-shave balm, cream; shaving cream; baby care products, not for medical use; non-medicinal baby creams; shampoos for infants, shampoos for babies; toiletries for babies, cosmetic products for baby baths, cosmetic products for baby protection; creams and milks for baby changing other than for medical use; baby wipes; thick wipes impregnated with cosmetic lotions for baby changing; foot powders not medicated; foot-care products other than for medical use, all the aforesaid goods made in the Paris areaACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 17, 2024ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB—
Aug 2, 2019FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Jul 16, 2019FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Jul 16, 2019FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
May 24, 2019OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
May 8, 2019OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
May 8, 2019OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Jul 16, 2018MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jul 16, 2018ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jan 19, 2018RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Dec 20, 2017CORNCORRECTION FROM THE IB EXAMINED, NO ACTION IS NEEDED—
Dec 18, 2017RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Dec 18, 2017RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Dec 8, 2017CRCVCORRECTION TRANSACTION RECEIVED FROM IB—
Dec 6, 2017RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Dec 5, 2017CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 25, 2017MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Nov 21, 2017DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 21, 2017NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Nov 16, 2017REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance