USPTO serial 79220944
INSTITUTO DE CERTIFICACIÓN DIGITAL ICD
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- ERVIN, INGA
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 111 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with INSTITUTO DE CERTIFICACIÓN DIGITAL ICD?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | Testing, analysis and evaluation of the services of others to determine conformity with certification standards; management of the testing, analysis and evaluation of the services of others to determine conformity with certification standards; providing a website that gives users the ability to create customized web pages featuring user-defined professional profiles; consultancy services relating to quality control of others; consultancy relating to monitoring of quality control of management systems; consultancy relating to quality control of professional profiles; quality control; quality control of management services; quality control of others, namely, professional profiles of others; quality control for others; quality control of management systems for third parties; quality control of professional profiles for third parties; testing, analysis and evaluation of professional profiles to assure compliance with industry standards; testing of computers; quality control of others, namely, testing of professional profiles; quality management services, namely, quality evaluation, analysis, quality assurance and quality control in the field of professional profiles; monitoring of quality management services; professional-profile quality assessment; monitoring of quality control processes; development, updating and maintenance of software and database systems; monitoring of professional-profile assessment quality control processes for others; quality auditing services of others to determine compliance with industry standards in the field of professional profiles; monitoring of system quality audit services of others to determine compliance with industry standards in the field of professional profiles; professional-profile quality audit services of others to determine compliance with industry standards in the field of professional profiles; testing services for certification of quality or standards in the field of professional profiles; testing services for certification of quality or standards regarding management systems in the field of professional profiles; testing services for certification of quality or standards regarding professional profiles in the field of professional profiles; testing, analysis and evaluation of the goods and services of others to determine conformity with certification standards; testing, analysis and evaluation of professional profiles to determine conformity with certification standards; testing, analysis and evaluation of computer management services to determine conformity with certification standards, in class 42; all these services excluding the design, manufacture, development, updating, processing, rental, installation and maintenance of computer software and computer hardware for registering, recording, storing, evaluating, processing, administrating, analyzing, archiving and documenting parameters and other laboratory data, and for the analysis and simulation of chemical, biochemical, biological and pharmaceutical reactions and processes, in particular for the chemical, biochemical, biological and pharmaceutical industries, as well as advice and technical support relating thereto | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 22, 2024 | ADCH | CHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB | — |
| Nov 8, 2020 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Oct 19, 2020 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 26, 2020 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 26, 2019 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 26, 2019 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 3, 2019 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Apr 17, 2019 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 17, 2019 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 29, 2019 | RFNP | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jan 28, 2019 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 28, 2019 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 12, 2018 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 12, 2018 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 11, 2018 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 11, 2018 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 11, 2018 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 18, 2018 | ATRV | ATTORNEY REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Apr 18, 2018 | LIME | LIMITATION FROM THE IB - REQUEST EXAM REVIEW | — |
| Apr 12, 2018 | LIMG | LIMITATION OF GOODS RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Jan 19, 2018 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Dec 14, 2017 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 14, 2017 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Dec 1, 2017 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Nov 30, 2017 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 28, 2017 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Nov 22, 2017 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 22, 2017 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Nov 16, 2017 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |