Drawing for GARDE-CÔTES

USPTO serial 79220966

GARDE-CÔTES

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
BLAZICH, JOAN MICHELE
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 122 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 602: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with GARDE-CÔTES?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

John J. O'Malley

John J. O'Malley VOLPE AND KOENIG, P.C.30 South 17th StreetSuite 1800Philadelphia, PA 19103

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
014Jewelry; precious stones; timepieces, horological and chronometric instruments; watches, wristwatches, clocks, clock cases being parts of clocks, alarm clocks, chronometers, chronometric instruments, chronographs, watches, small clocks; dials for timepieces, namely, dials for watches, chronometers and clocks; timepiece movements, namely, movements for watches, chronometers and clocks; watch springs, watch glasses, watch chains, watch cases being parts of watches, watch bands, buckles for watch bands, watch clasps, watch pouches, watch crowns, watch winders, watch hands, watch anchors, watch barrels, watch pendulums; presentation cases adapted for holding timepieces, presentation cases and boxes adapted for holding watches or timepieces; jewelry cases, boxes of precious metal; cuff linksACTIVE—
025Clothing, namely, shirts, shorts, pants, dresses, skirts, socks and coats; underwear; footwear; headwearACTIVE—
035Retail store services featuring jewelry, watches and timepieces; online retail store services featuring jewelry, watches and timepieces; presentation of products on any communication media, namely, retail and online retail store services featuring jewelry, watches and timepieces; retail store services featuring clothing, underwear, footwear and headwear; online retail store services featuring clothing, underwear, footwear and headwear; presentation of goods on all communication media, namely, retail and online retail store services featuring clothing, underwear, footwear and headwearACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 3, 2020FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Mar 13, 2020FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Mar 13, 2020FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Jun 20, 2019NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
May 3, 2019OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Apr 17, 2019OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Apr 17, 2019OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Mar 13, 2019MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Mar 13, 2019ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Aug 15, 2018GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 15, 2018GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 15, 2018CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 31, 2018TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jul 31, 2018CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 24, 2018ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jul 10, 2018TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jan 27, 2018RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Jan 10, 2018RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Jan 10, 2018RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Dec 21, 2017RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Dec 20, 2017CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 19, 2017DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 28, 2017MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Nov 22, 2017NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Nov 16, 2017REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance