Drawing for NAOMOTO

USPTO serial 79220995

NAOMOTO

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 5699781Status 739Registered
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Mar 19, 2019
Examiner
SUAREZ, MARIA VICTORIA
Law office
Historical data usage

What this means

This trademark is registered with the USPTO. Monitoring new filings can help you catch lookalike marks early.

Need help with NAOMOTO?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Boris Umansky

Boris Umansky Ladas & Parry LLP224 S. Michigan Avenue, Ste. 1600CHICAGO, IL 60604United States

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
007Steam ironing machines for commercial use; electric clothing pressing machines for commercial dry cleaning and laundry purposes including shirt press, collar and cuff press, utility press, legger press, drapery press, pants topper, mushroom topper and puff iron; clothing pressing machines, electric; dry-cleaning machines; electric iron finishing machines for commercial use [ ; dishwashers; electric vacuum cleaners; steam cleaning machines; felt milling machines; dyeing machines; textile bonding machines; textile tentering machines; rotary presses for textiles; food peeling machines for commercial use; packaging machines for food and beverages; bottle capping machines for food and beverages; sublimation transfer printing machines; printing machines ]ACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 28, 2026INPRPARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
Jun 30, 2025NA75NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED—
Jun 30, 2025C75AREGISTERED - SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK.—
Jun 23, 2025APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Mar 13, 2025ES75TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED—
Mar 19, 2024REM3COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (6-YR) E-MAILED—
Aug 2, 2019FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Jul 13, 2019FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Jul 13, 2019FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Jun 19, 2019FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Mar 19, 2019R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Jan 1, 2019NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Jan 1, 2019PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Dec 12, 2018NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Sep 4, 2018PBCRWITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY—
Aug 18, 2018CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Aug 18, 2018TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Aug 18, 2018CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 15, 2018ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jul 25, 2018NREVNOTICE OF REVIVAL - MAILED—
Jul 25, 2018TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jul 25, 2018PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Jul 25, 2018PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Jul 13, 2018MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jul 13, 2018ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jan 19, 2018RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Jan 5, 2018NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Dec 15, 2017RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Dec 15, 2017RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Dec 6, 2017RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Dec 5, 2017CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 28, 2017MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Nov 22, 2017DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 22, 2017NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Nov 16, 2017LIMILIMITATION FROM ORIGINAL APPLICATION ENTERED—
Nov 16, 2017REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance