Drawing for KERASHAPE

USPTO serial 79221124

KERASHAPE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
BLAIR, JASON
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 104 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with KERASHAPE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Jay F. Moldovanyi

Jay F. Moldovanyi Fay Sharpe LLP1228 Euclid Avenue 5th FlrCleveland, OH 44115UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
019Building materials (not of metal); tiles, panels, plates, mouldings, pipes and linings for building, all the aforesaid goods not of metal; ceramic panels, plates, mosaics and shaped parts (building materials, not of metal) for buildingACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 25, 2025NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Jul 23, 2025CHLDCHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB—
Feb 26, 2022NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Jul 26, 2019FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Jul 11, 2019FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Jul 11, 2019FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Jul 11, 2018MAB1ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT—
Jul 11, 2018ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED—
Jul 10, 2018EXARTEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED—
Jul 9, 2018ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jul 9, 2018REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
May 14, 2018ATRVATTORNEY REVIEW COMPLETED—
May 14, 2018CREVCORRECTION FROM IB ENTERED - ATTORNEY REVIEW REQUIRED—
May 4, 2018CRCVCORRECTION TRANSACTION RECEIVED FROM IB—
Feb 10, 2018RFNPREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Jan 13, 2018RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Jan 13, 2018RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Dec 28, 2017RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Dec 27, 2017CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 5, 2017DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 29, 2017MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Nov 25, 2017NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Nov 17, 2017LIMILIMITATION FROM ORIGINAL APPLICATION ENTERED—
Nov 16, 2017REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance