USPTO serial 79221168
RELISH MADE IN GLAM
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 402
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SETTLES LEWIS, SHAILA E
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 114 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with RELISH MADE IN GLAM?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 018 | Rucksacks; daypacks; overnight bags; small suitcases; valises, travel baggage, garment bags for travel; attache cases; haversacks; duffle "bags; pocket wallets; coin purses, not of precious metal; key cases of leather and skins; key cases of imitation leather; tie cases for travel; leather briefcases; suit carriers; clutch bags; umbrellas, parasols and walking sticks; hip bags; briefcases; holdalls for sports clothing; duffle bags for travel; kit bags; handbags for ladies; travelling sets (leatherware); evening purses (handbags); small purses (handbags); purses; small bags for men; all-purpose sports bags; bags and holdalls for sports clothing; chain mesh purses; shoe bags for travel; purses and wallets; vanity cases sold empty; footlockers; trunks and travelling bags; travelling trunks; cosmetic cases sold empty; key cases; credit card cases of leather; business card cases; leather cases for keys; leather cases; cases of imitation leather; credit card cases and holders (leatherware); travelling cases of leather | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
| 025 | Clothing, namely, dresses, evening dresses, ball gowns, wedding dresses; leisure wear; skirts, trousers, leggings (trousers), shorts, jeans, shirts, polo shirts, T-shirts, short-sleeved or long-sleeved T-shirts, tops (clothing), tailleurs, women's suits, pantsuits, dress suits, men's suits, neckties, masquerade costumes, jackets, blousons, coats, fur coats and jackets, fur jackets, padded jackets, heavy jackets, sport coats, overcoats, headscarves, scarves, bandanas (neckerchiefs), shawls, headscarves and stoles, fur stoles, gloves, belts (Clothing), sweaters and pullovers, cardigans, clothing for sports, sports jerseys and breeches for sports, snow suits, ski suits, track suits, wind breakers, wind shirts, bathing costumes and trunks, bath robes and beach dresses, underwear, lingerie, loungewear, pyjamas, nightshirts; the above mentioned clothing except for socks, stockings, tights, panty hose, aprons; footwear, namely, sneakers, gymnastic shoes, footwear for sports; baby shoes, baby booties; boots, rain boots, ski boots, ladies' boots, sandals, clogs, slippers; hats, fur hats, small hats, caps, cap peaks, visor caps | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 20, 2023 | DENA | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED | — |
| Mar 19, 2023 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Aug 16, 2019 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jul 30, 2019 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 30, 2019 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 31, 2018 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 30, 2018 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 30, 2018 | ATRV | ATTORNEY REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| May 4, 2018 | CREV | CORRECTION FROM IB ENTERED - ATTORNEY REVIEW REQUIRED | — |
| Apr 13, 2018 | CRCV | CORRECTION TRANSACTION RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Jan 5, 2018 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Dec 13, 2017 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 13, 2017 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Nov 30, 2017 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Nov 29, 2017 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 29, 2017 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Nov 25, 2017 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 25, 2017 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Nov 17, 2017 | LIMI | LIMITATION FROM ORIGINAL APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Nov 16, 2017 | SDRC | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A SUBSEQ DESIG FROM IB | — |