Drawing for HEYHOVER

USPTO serial 79221282

HEYHOVER

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 401
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
SHANOSKI, JOANNA MARIE
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 104 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with HEYHOVER?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
014Earrings; necklaces coated with precious metal; rings coated with precious metal; badges coated with precious metals; brooches coated with precious metal; trinkets coated with precious metal; wire of precious metal jewellery; ornamental pins made of precious metal; jewellery ornaments for personal use; jewellery chains; bracelets of precious metal; gold rings jewellery; necklaces jewellery; rings jewellery; ankle bracelets jewellery; jewelerys and precious metals; brooches jewellery; silver rings jewellery; pendants jewellery; pins jewellerySECTION 70 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 4, 2018DENANOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED—
Aug 3, 2018DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Jan 27, 2018RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Jan 10, 2018RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Jan 10, 2018RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Dec 20, 2017RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Dec 19, 2017CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 19, 2017RFWRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) WITHDRAWN FOR REVIEW—
Dec 12, 2017MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Dec 8, 2017RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Dec 7, 2017CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 7, 2017DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 7, 2017NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Nov 23, 2017REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance