CopyMark Law Group
4.9/5
Drawing for KLEARCUP

USPTO serial 79221288

KLEARCUP

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 5609044Status 709
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Nov 20, 2018
Examiner
BATT, JAIME L
Law office
PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with KLEARCUP?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Trademark Monitoring
(312) 319-4460
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Start a new application
(312) 319-4460

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Steven M. Espenshade

Steven M. Espenshade Pirkey Barber PLLC1801 East 6th Street, Suite 300Austin, TX 78702United States

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
016plastic films for wrapping and packagingSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—
017plastics in extruded form for use in further manufacturing; extruded plastics in the form of sheets and films for use in manufacturingSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—
020plastic boxes, namely, boxes for food packaging; plastic containers for food packagingSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 12, 2026XXSSGENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION SENT TO IB—
Oct 12, 2026XXCRGENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION CREATED—
Feb 6, 2026INTRTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
Jun 6, 2025C71TCANCELLED SECTION 71—
Aug 23, 2024TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Aug 23, 2024ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Aug 23, 2024REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Aug 23, 2024CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED—
Aug 23, 2024COARTEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED—
Mar 8, 2024NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Nov 19, 2023NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Oct 22, 2022NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
May 1, 2020NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
May 17, 2019FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Feb 28, 2019XXSSGENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION SENT TO IB—
Feb 28, 2019XXCRGENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION CREATED—
Feb 20, 2019FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Nov 20, 2018R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Sep 4, 2018PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Aug 31, 2018GPNXNOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB—
Aug 15, 2018OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Aug 15, 2018OP2RNOTICE OF START OF OPPOSITION PERIOD CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Aug 15, 2018NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jul 24, 2018CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jun 25, 2018TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jun 25, 2018CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 25, 2018TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jan 19, 2018RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Dec 29, 2017RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Dec 29, 2017RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Dec 15, 2017RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Dec 14, 2017CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 8, 2017DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 2, 2017MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Nov 28, 2017NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Nov 23, 2017REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance