USPTO serial 79221310
GLASSESON
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 5572656Status 739Registered
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Oct 2, 2018
- Examiner
- HACK, ANDREA R
- Law office
- Historical data usage
What this means
This trademark is registered with the USPTO. Monitoring new filings can help you catch lookalike marks early.
Need help with GLASSESON?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Laura M. Konkel
Laura M. Konkel Michael Best & Friedrich LLP790 N Water Street, Suite 2500Milwaukee, WI 53202United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | computer software for determining optical parameters, namely, computer software for determining optical parameters of eyeglasses lens; computer software for determining a pupillary distance; computer software for determining an eyeglasses prescription; computer software for determining a power of lenses, and a power of eyeglasses including spherical power, cylindrical power and cylindrical axis; computer software for determining a refractive error of the eye, a refractive astigmatic error of the eye, an uncorrected visual acuity, and a corrected visual acuity; computer software and hardware for determining optical parameters, namely, computer software and hardware for determining optical parameters of eyeglasses lens; computer software and hardware for determining a pupillary distance; computer software and hardware for determining an eyeglasses prescription; computer software and hardware for determining a power of lenses, and a power of eyeglasses including spherical power, cylindrical power and cylindrical axis; computer software and hardware for determining a refractive error of the eye, a refractive astigmatic error of the eye, an uncorrected visual acuity, and a corrected visual acuity; computer application software for mobile devices, mobile phones, portable devices, and smartphones for determining optical parameters, namely, computer application software for mobile devices, mobile phones, portable devices, and smartphones for determining optical parameters of eyeglasses lens; computer application software for mobile devices, mobile phones, portable devices, and smartphones for determining a pupillary distance; computer application software for mobile devices, mobile phones, portable devices, and smartphones for determining an eyeglasses prescription; computer application software for mobile devices, mobile phones, portable devices, and smartphones for determining a power of lenses, and a power of eyeglasses including spherical power, cylindrical power and cylindrical axis; computer application software for mobile devices, mobile phones, portable devices, and smartphones for determining a refractive error of the eye, a refractive astigmatic error of the eye, an uncorrected visual acuity, and a corrected visual acuity; downloadable mobile applications for determining optical parameters, namely, downloadable mobile applications for determining optical parameters of eyeglasses lens; downloadable mobile applications for determining a pupillary distance; downloadable mobile applications for determining an eyeglasses prescription; downloadable mobile applications for determining a power of lenses, and a power of eyeglasses including spherical power, cylindrical power and cylindrical axis; downloadable mobile applications for determining a refractive error of the eye, a refractive astigmatic error of the eye, an uncorrected visual acuity, and/or a corrected visual acuity | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 4, 2025 | NA75 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 4, 2025 | C75A | REGISTERED - SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Jan 28, 2025 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jul 25, 2024 | ES75 | TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 2, 2023 | REM3 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 23, 2022 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 16, 2021 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Dec 16, 2021 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 16, 2021 | ECDR | TEAS CHANGE OF DOMESTIC REPRESENTATIVES ADDRESS | — |
| Dec 16, 2021 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 16, 2021 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 16, 2021 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 2, 2019 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jan 11, 2019 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 11, 2019 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Jan 2, 2019 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 2, 2018 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jul 20, 2018 | GPNX | NOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jul 17, 2018 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 17, 2018 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 4, 2018 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 4, 2018 | OP2R | NOTICE OF START OF OPPOSITION PERIOD CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 27, 2018 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 20, 2018 | LIMN | LIMITATION FROM THE IB EXAMINED, NO ACTION IS NEEDED | — |
| Jun 14, 2018 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 12, 2018 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 11, 2018 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 11, 2018 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 8, 2018 | LIMG | LIMITATION OF GOODS RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Jan 29, 2018 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 29, 2018 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 19, 2018 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Dec 14, 2017 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 14, 2017 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Dec 9, 2017 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Dec 6, 2017 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Dec 5, 2017 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 5, 2017 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 5, 2017 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Nov 23, 2017 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |