USPTO serial 79221358
KESTENBAUM'S
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- PEREZ, STEVEN M
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 101 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with KESTENBAUM'S?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Blake R. Hartz
Blake R. Hartz Woodard Emhardt Moriarty McNett & Henry111 Monument Circle, Suite 3700Indianapolis, IN 46204-5137UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 030 | Matzot, namely, matzo; matzah meal, crackers; matzah farfel in the nature of matzah-based pellet-shaped pasta; matzah-based food products, namely, bread, crackers, cake meal, mixes for making matzo balls; soup nuts; coffee, tea, cocoa, sugar, rice, tapioca, sago, artificial coffee; chocolate and flavoring syrups for making food beverages; cocoa-based beverages; flour and preparations made from cereals, namely, processed cereals, cereal-based snack food, cereal bars; noodles; macaroni; spaghetti; breads and bread crumbs; cake mixes; muffins; pancake mixes; bakery supplies, namely gluten flour, flour; yeast; chocolate syrup; cocoa drops in the nature of chocolate chips; baking soda; baking powder; sugar dots in the nature of candy; vanilla sugar; corn starch; corn syrup; pretzels; frozen ready baked products, namely, bakery goods; puffed pastries; frozen pies and shells, being pastry; frozen meringue pies; frozen muffin batter; frozen cookie batter; frozen preformed cookies; frozen pizza; pizza crust and sandwich wraps; frozen blintzes; pancakes; waffles; French toast; frozen pasta dishes; pasta; frozen quiches; frozen coffee; frozen puddings; pudding mixes; ices; honey, treacle; salt; ketchup; mustard; vinegar; sauces; fruit sauces; spices; syrups, namely, topping syrups; salad dressings and sauces; mayonnaise; citrus gel, unflavored gel, cherry gel, strawberry gel, blueberry gel, orange gel, lemon gel, raspberry gel and lime gel, all being desserts in the nature of sweetened and unsweetened gelatins; canned puddings; tomato products, namely, ketchup, tomato sauce, pizza and pasta sauces, marinara sauce and spaghetti sauce; soup crackers; breakfast cereals; cereal-based snack foods; processed cereals; oatmeal; rice and wheat based snacks; peanut butter-based snacks, being confectionery; corn-based snack foods; bakery products, namely cookies, sandwich cookies, cakes; muffins, scones; pastries; pies; cream puffs; croissants; bagels; bread; crackers; biscuits; wafers; sandwiches; croutons; confectionery, namely chewing gum; bubble gum; candy; mint candies; marshmallows; chocolate; chocolate candies; chocolate bars; chocolate covered nuts; pralines; chocolate based products, namely, chocolate confections and chocolate spreads | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 4, 2021 | DENA | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 3, 2021 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Oct 4, 2019 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Sep 19, 2019 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 19, 2019 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| May 10, 2019 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Apr 24, 2019 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 24, 2019 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 20, 2018 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 19, 2018 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 21, 2018 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Feb 21, 2018 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 21, 2018 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 20, 2018 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 19, 2018 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 19, 2018 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 19, 2018 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Dec 20, 2017 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 20, 2017 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Dec 10, 2017 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Dec 9, 2017 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 9, 2017 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Dec 5, 2017 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 5, 2017 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Nov 23, 2017 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |