Drawing for VALLKREE

USPTO serial 79221380

VALLKREE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
DETMER, CAROLYN ROSE
Law office
TTAB

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 604: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with VALLKREE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

FRANCIS J CIARAMELLA

FRANCIS J CIARAMELLA FRANCIS JOHN CIARAMELLA PLLC110 FRONT STREETSUITE 300JUPITER, FL 33477

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
012Electric bikes and bicycles; electric go-karts; Electric tricycles not being toys; Electric quadricycles; Electric motors and engines for bikes, bicycles, go-karts, tricycles, quad bikes, namely, bicycle racks for vehicles, bicycle handlebar grips, bicycle pedals, saddles for bicycles, bicycle tires, and side car; all of the foregoing not for use with motorcycles and their parts thereforeABANDONED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 5, 2025FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Aug 19, 2025FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Aug 19, 2025FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Nov 2, 2024RFNPREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Oct 16, 2024IRRFIRREGULARITY ON REFUSAL FROM IB—
Aug 19, 2024MAB4ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION—
Aug 19, 2024ABN4ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION—
Aug 19, 2024OP.TOPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999—
Aug 19, 2024OP.SOPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999—
Jun 3, 2024IRRFIRREGULARITY ON REFUSAL FROM IB—
May 21, 2024ETOPEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE PROCESS - TERMINATED—
May 21, 2024OP.IOPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999—
May 16, 2024OPNSOPPOSITION NOTICE (IB REFUSAL) SENT TO IB—
May 16, 2024OPNCOPPOSITION NOTICE (IB REFUSAL) CREATED—
Feb 12, 2024ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED—
Jan 16, 2024NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Jan 16, 2024PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jan 13, 2024GPNXNOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB—
Dec 27, 2023OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Dec 27, 2023OP2RNOTICE OF START OF OPPOSITION PERIOD CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Dec 27, 2023NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Jan 26, 2022DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 16, 2021PBCRWITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY—
Feb 1, 2021CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jan 29, 2021EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Jan 29, 2021EXPREX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL REVERSED—
Nov 9, 2020GNSNNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED—
Nov 9, 2020GNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED—
Nov 9, 2020CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED—
Sep 15, 2020JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Jul 13, 2020GEA1NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED—
Jul 13, 2020GECDACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED—
Jul 13, 2020CNCFACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED—
May 14, 2020TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
May 14, 2020CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 12, 2020ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
May 12, 2020EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
May 12, 2020JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
May 12, 2020EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Nov 12, 2019GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Nov 12, 2019GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Nov 12, 2019CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Sep 10, 2019TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Sep 10, 2019CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 10, 2019TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 28, 2019RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
May 17, 2019GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 17, 2019GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 17, 2019CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 10, 2019OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Apr 24, 2019OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Apr 24, 2019OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Mar 12, 2019DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 25, 2019DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 10, 2019RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Jan 10, 2019ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
May 15, 2018GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
May 15, 2018GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
May 15, 2018CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Apr 30, 2018TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Apr 28, 2018CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 28, 2018ERSITEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED—
Mar 27, 2018GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Mar 27, 2018GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Mar 27, 2018CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Mar 24, 2018TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Mar 23, 2018CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 23, 2018ERSITEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED—
Feb 18, 2018TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Feb 13, 2018CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Feb 12, 2018CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Feb 7, 2018TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Feb 7, 2018CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 7, 2018TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jan 19, 2018RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Dec 16, 2017RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Dec 16, 2017RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Dec 9, 2017MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Dec 7, 2017RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Dec 6, 2017CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 5, 2017DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 5, 2017NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Nov 23, 2017REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance