Drawing for PATANJALI

USPTO serial 79221453

PATANJALI

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 5651897Status 706Registered
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Jan 15, 2019
Examiner
FIRST, VIVIAN M
Law office
Historical data usage

What this means

This trademark is registered with the USPTO. Monitoring new filings can help you catch lookalike marks early.

Need help with PATANJALI?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Anthony J. Bourget

Anthony J. Bourget Bourget Law, S.C.2809 E. Hamilton Ave., Ste. 195P.O. Box 81Eau Claire, WI 54702-0081

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
029[ Meat, fish, poultry and game not live; meat extracts; ] preserved, dried and cooked fruits and vegetables; jellies, jams, compotes; [ eggs, ] milk and milk products excluding ice cream [ , ice milk and frozen yogurt; ] edible oils and fatsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 10, 2026INNPPARTIAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB—
Aug 14, 2026INPSPARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB—
Aug 14, 2026INPCINVALIDATION PROCESSED—
May 28, 2026RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED—
Jan 12, 2026INPRPARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
May 12, 2025NA15SEC. 15 ACKNOWLEDGEMENT - E-MAILED—
May 12, 2025NA71NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED—
May 12, 202515AKREGISTERED - SEC. 15 ACKNOWLEDGED—
May 12, 202571AGREGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED—
May 5, 2025APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Jan 6, 2025E15RTEAS SECTION 15 RECEIVED—
Jan 6, 2025ES71TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED—
Jan 15, 2024REM3COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (6-YR) E-MAILED—
May 17, 2019FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
May 1, 2019FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Apr 30, 2019FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Apr 15, 2019FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Jan 15, 2019R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Oct 30, 2018NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Oct 30, 2018PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Oct 26, 2018GPNXNOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB—
Oct 10, 2018OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Oct 10, 2018OP2RNOTICE OF START OF OPPOSITION PERIOD CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Oct 10, 2018NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Sep 27, 2018PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Sep 26, 2018CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Sep 26, 2018TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Sep 26, 2018CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 19, 2018ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Sep 14, 2018NREVNOTICE OF REVIVAL - MAILED—
Sep 14, 2018TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Sep 14, 2018PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Sep 14, 2018PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Jul 16, 2018MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jul 16, 2018ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jan 19, 2018RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Dec 16, 2017RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Dec 16, 2017RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Dec 9, 2017MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Dec 7, 2017RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Dec 6, 2017CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 5, 2017DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 5, 2017NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Nov 23, 2017REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance