USPTO serial 79221972
LIMAPS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- REINHART, MEGHAN M
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 108 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with LIMAPS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Recorded content; information technology and audio-visual devices; magnets, magnetizers and demagnetizers; apparatus for conducting, switching, transforming, accumulating, regulating or controlling electricity; apparatus, instruments and cables for electricity; optical devices, enhancers and correctors; safety, security, protection and signalling devices; diving equipment; navigation, guidance, tracking, targeting and map making devices; measuring, detecting and monitoring instruments, indicators and controllers; scientific research and laboratory apparatus, educational apparatus and simulators; navigation systems; software for navigation systems | ACTIVE | — |
| 012 | Vehicles and conveyances; parts and fittings of all the aforesaid goods, included in this class | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | IT services, namely, software development, programming and implementation of software, computer hardware development, hosting services, and software as a service and rental of software, rental of computer hardware and computer peripherals, IT consultancy, advisory and information services relating to computer software, IT security services in the nature of protection and recovery of computer data, duplication of computer programs; conversion of computer programs and data, other than physical conversion; data encryption services; computer analysis and diagnostics, research services in the field of information technology; development of computers and data processing systems, computer project management services, data mining, digital watermarking, computer programming services, technological services relating to computers, computer network services, updating of computer software, data migration services, updating websites for others, monitoring of computer systems by remote access; scientific and technological services; testing, authentication and quality control; design services; rental, hire and leasing in connection with the aforesaid services, included in this class; advice, consultancy and information for the aforesaid services, included in this class; design and development of navigation systems | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 3, 2025 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 30, 2019 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Aug 12, 2019 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 10, 2019 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| May 17, 2019 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| May 1, 2019 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| May 1, 2019 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 13, 2018 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 10, 2018 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 27, 2018 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jan 9, 2018 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 9, 2018 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Dec 19, 2017 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Dec 18, 2017 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 12, 2017 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Dec 8, 2017 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 8, 2017 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Nov 30, 2017 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |