USPTO serial 79222033
QSSP
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 5567751Status 709
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Sep 25, 2018
- Examiner
- MITTLER, ROBIN M
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with QSSP?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
George W. Lewis
George W. Lewis Westerman, Hattori, Daniels & Adrian, LLP8500 Leesburg PikeSuite 7500Tysons, VA 22182Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | Metalworking machines and metalworking machine tools; Loading-unloading machines; Plastic processing machines; Metalworking machines, namely, machining centers; Injection molding machines; Electric discharge machines for metalworking; Industrial robots, namely, metalworking robots, plastic processing robots, food or beverage processing robots, painting robots, welding robots, carrying robots, electronic component manufacturing robots, electronic circuit assembling robots, wrapping robots, and packaging robots; Industrial robots; Machines and apparatus for processing food or beverages, namely, electric food processors and beverage processing machines; Painting machines; Painting apparatus, namely, paint sprayers and air brushes for applying paint; Semi-conductor manufacturing machines; Electronic component manufacturing device, namely, machines for manufacturing semiconductors and liquid crystal display devices; Packing or wrapping machines | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
| 009 | Electronic machines, apparatus and their parts, namely, electronic numerical controllers and electronic computer numerical controllers both being electronic interface equipment for machine tools to input or output CNC (computer numerical control) data; Computer software for use in supporting startup of robot systems consisting of combination of industrial robots, metalworking machines, machining centers, injection molding machines and electric discharge machines | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 23, 2026 | INNT | TOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Jul 5, 2026 | INTS | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 5, 2026 | INPC | INVALIDATION PROCESSED | — |
| Dec 11, 2025 | INTR | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Apr 11, 2025 | C71T | CANCELLED SECTION 71 | — |
| Sep 25, 2023 | REM3 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 25, 2019 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jan 7, 2019 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 7, 2019 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Dec 25, 2018 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 25, 2018 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jul 20, 2018 | GPNX | NOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jul 10, 2018 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 10, 2018 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 4, 2018 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 4, 2018 | OP2R | NOTICE OF START OF OPPOSITION PERIOD CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 20, 2018 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 4, 2018 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 4, 2018 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Jun 4, 2018 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 4, 2018 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 4, 2018 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 13, 2018 | GPRN | NOTIFICATION OF PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Apr 13, 2018 | GPRA | PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Apr 13, 2018 | CPRA | PRIORITY ACTION WRITTEN | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Mar 13, 2018 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 13, 2018 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 9, 2018 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 26, 2018 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 26, 2018 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 26, 2018 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 3, 2018 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jan 13, 2018 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 13, 2018 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Dec 29, 2017 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Dec 28, 2017 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 19, 2017 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 15, 2017 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Dec 11, 2017 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Nov 30, 2017 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |