USPTO serial 79222095
BIGFOOT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- GLASSER, CARYN
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 105 - MANAGING ATTORNEY
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with BIGFOOT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 010 | Artificial implants; artificial orthopaedic implants; biodegradable bone fixation implants; compressing screws in the nature of orthopaedic surgical implants; hip implants; implant materials (prosthesis) for use in dental surgery; implant materials (prosthesis) for use in surgery; implant models; implants (prosthesis); implants (prosthesis) for bone surgery; implants (prosthesis) for dental surgery; implants (prosthesis) for ligaments; implants (prosthesis) for use in bone grafting; implants (prosthesis) for use in dentistry; implants (prosthesis) for use in facial surgery; implants (prosthesis) for use in human medicine; implants (prosthesis) for use in jaw surgery; implants (prosthesis) for use in jawbone surgery; implants (prosthesis) for use in oral surgery; implants (prosthesis) for use in tendons; implants (prosthesis) for use in the body; implants for osteosynthesis; instruments for inserting surgical implants; lag screws in the nature of orthopaedic surgical implants; medical implants; orthopaedic implants; orthopaedic joint implant prostheses; otological implants; plates in the nature of orthopaedic surgical implants; prosthetic hip joint implants; prosthetic implant apparatus; prosthetic implant instruments; prosthetic implants; surgical implant materials; surgical implants comprised of artificial materials | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 26, 2021 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 19, 2019 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Sep 4, 2019 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 4, 2019 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| May 17, 2019 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| May 1, 2019 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| May 1, 2019 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 4, 2018 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 4, 2018 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 24, 2018 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Feb 6, 2018 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 6, 2018 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Feb 4, 2018 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Feb 3, 2018 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 1, 2018 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 6, 2018 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 12, 2017 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Dec 8, 2017 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Nov 30, 2017 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |