USPTO serial 79222099
GREEN MARK VODKA ORIGINAL RECIPE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 601
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- FICKES, JERI J
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 107 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with GREEN MARK VODKA ORIGINAL RECIPE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Maxim A. Voltchenko
Maxim A. Voltchenko Kaplan Breyer Schwarz, LLP90 Matawan Road - Suite 201Matawan, NJ 07747UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 033 | Vodka | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 7, 2021 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| May 19, 2021 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| May 19, 2021 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| May 19, 2020 | MAB1 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT | — |
| May 19, 2020 | ABN1 | ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED | — |
| May 19, 2020 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| May 19, 2020 | EXDD | EXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED | — |
| Sep 30, 2019 | GNS1 | NOTIFICATION OF SUBSEQUENT FINAL EMAILED | — |
| Sep 30, 2019 | GNSF | SUBSEQUENT FINAL EMAILED | — |
| Sep 30, 2019 | CFRC | SUBSEQUENT FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 14, 2019 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 13, 2019 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 13, 2019 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 23, 2019 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 23, 2019 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| May 17, 2019 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| May 1, 2019 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| May 1, 2019 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 15, 2019 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 15, 2019 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 15, 2019 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 25, 2019 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 25, 2019 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 22, 2019 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jan 19, 2019 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Jan 19, 2019 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jan 19, 2019 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Jan 18, 2019 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 18, 2018 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Jul 18, 2018 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 18, 2018 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 3, 2018 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 2, 2018 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 2, 2018 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 19, 2018 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Dec 31, 2017 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 30, 2017 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Dec 16, 2017 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Dec 15, 2017 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 12, 2017 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Dec 8, 2017 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 8, 2017 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Nov 30, 2017 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |