USPTO serial 79222104
UNIPHONE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SWAIN, MICHELE LYNN
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with UNIPHONE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
TOVARYSTVO Z OBMEZHENOIU VIPDOVIDALNISTIU "YUNIK TEKHNOLODZHIZ"
UA
Other trademarks owned by TOVARYSTVO Z OBMEZHENOIU VIPDOVIDALNISTIU "YUNIK TEKHNOLODZHIZ"
TOVARYSTVO Z OBMEZHENOIU VIPDOVIDALNISTIU "YUNIK TEKHNOLODZHIZ"
UA
Other trademarks owned by TOVARYSTVO Z OBMEZHENOIU VIPDOVIDALNISTIU "YUNIK TEKHNOLODZHIZ"
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Downloadable computer programs for transmitting voice, data and images; computer operating programs, recorded; downloadable computer software applications for transmitting voice, data and images; computer software recorded on data media for transmitting voice, data and images | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by TOVARYSTVO Z OBMEZHENOIU VIPDOVIDALNISTIU "YUNIK TEKHNOLODZHIZ"
- Other trademarks owned by TOVARYSTVO Z OBMEZHENOIU VIPDOVIDALNISTIU "YUNIK TEKHNOLODZHIZ"
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Similar marks named UNIPHONE
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 20, 2019 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Nov 29, 2019 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 29, 2019 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 29, 2018 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Nov 29, 2018 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Nov 29, 2018 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Nov 29, 2018 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Sep 29, 2018 | RFNP | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Aug 31, 2018 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Aug 28, 2018 | OPNS | OPPOSITION NOTICE (IB REFUSAL) SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 28, 2018 | OPNC | OPPOSITION NOTICE (IB REFUSAL) CREATED | — |
| Aug 27, 2018 | OPPF | OPPOSITION PAPERS RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Aug 8, 2018 | LOPR | LETTER OF PROTEST EVIDENCE REVIEWED-NO FURTHER ACTION TAKEN | — |
| Aug 3, 2018 | LOPT | LETTER OF PROTEST EVIDENCE FORWARDED | — |
| Jul 31, 2018 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 27, 2018 | GPNX | NOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jul 11, 2018 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 11, 2018 | OP2R | NOTICE OF START OF OPPOSITION PERIOD CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 11, 2018 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 27, 2018 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 5, 2018 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 4, 2018 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 4, 2018 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 27, 2018 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jan 9, 2018 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 9, 2018 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Dec 19, 2017 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Dec 18, 2017 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 12, 2017 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Dec 8, 2017 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 8, 2017 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Nov 30, 2017 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |