USPTO serial 79222121
CRIMPFOX EFFECT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 5682561Status 709
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Feb 26, 2019
- Examiner
- OSGOOD, KRYSTINA E
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with CRIMPFOX EFFECT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | Crimping tools being machines and parts of machines; tool cutting machines; wire stripping machines for removing the covering from electric cables | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
| 008 | Hand operated crimping tools, namely, crimp wrenches, wire crimpers; hand operated tools, namely, wire cutters; hand operated tools, namely, wire strippers | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Phoenix Contact GmbH & Co. KG
- Other trademarks owned by Phoenix Contact GmbH & Co. KG
- Other trademarks owned by Phoenix Contact GmbH & Co. KG
- Other trademarks in Class 007
- Other trademarks in Class 008
- Similar marks named CRIMPFOX EFFECT
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 12, 2026 | INTR | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Sep 12, 2025 | C71T | CANCELLED SECTION 71 | — |
| Jul 5, 2019 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jun 17, 2019 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 17, 2019 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| May 26, 2019 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 26, 2019 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Dec 11, 2018 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 7, 2018 | GPNX | NOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Nov 21, 2018 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 21, 2018 | OP2R | NOTICE OF START OF OPPOSITION PERIOD CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 21, 2018 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Nov 6, 2018 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 15, 2018 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 15, 2018 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 10, 2018 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 26, 2018 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - MAILED | — |
| Sep 26, 2018 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 26, 2018 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Sep 26, 2018 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 20, 2018 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 20, 2018 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 24, 2018 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Feb 7, 2018 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 7, 2018 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Feb 2, 2018 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Feb 1, 2018 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 31, 2018 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 12, 2017 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Dec 8, 2017 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Nov 30, 2017 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |