USPTO serial 79222165
Serial No. 79222165
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 402
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SHEN, ELIZABETH S
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 121 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with Serial No. 79222165?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Jays Close; Basingstoke, Hampshire, GB
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jeffrey A. Smith
Jeffrey A. Smith Millen, White, Zelano & Branigan, P.C.2200 Clarendon BoulevardSuite 1400Arlington, VA 22201Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 038 | Telecommunications services; chat room services; internet portal services; email services; remote data access services; provision of access via the Internet, VPN and telephone to an application hub, the application hub providing integration of computer telephony, web, email, chat, sms and other communications methods whereby people who wish to communicate with the customer are put into contact via the application hub; provision of access via the Internet and telephone to an application hub, the application hub enabling person-to-person, business-to-business and customer-to-business contact in multiple media formats with applications comprising at least one of: voice processing, call recording, message archival, call routing of communications, speech recognition, speech and text analytics, biometrics, interactive voice response, lie detection, stress analysis, data processing and collection, credit card transaction, telephony, conferencing, video, word spotting, instant messaging, web chat, forecasting, scheduling, rostering, training, coaching, quality management, call scripting, analytics, workforce management, workforce optimisation, knowledge management, semantic analysis, topic extraction, machine learning, mobile services and web services, whereby people who wish to communicate with the customer are put into contact via the application hub; provision of access via the Internet, VPN and telephone to an application hub, the application hub providing the processing facilities of a call or contact centre | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
| 042 | Platform as a service (PAAS) featuring computer software platforms for contact center management | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 23, 2019 | DENA | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 22, 2019 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Aug 13, 2018 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Aug 13, 2018 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 13, 2018 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 19, 2018 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 19, 2018 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 19, 2018 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 9, 2018 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 27, 2018 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jan 8, 2018 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 8, 2018 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Dec 16, 2017 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Dec 15, 2017 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 12, 2017 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Dec 8, 2017 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 8, 2017 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Nov 30, 2017 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |