Drawing for NEWVOICEMEDIA

USPTO serial 79222166

NEWVOICEMEDIA

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
SHEN, ELIZABETH S
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 121 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with NEWVOICEMEDIA?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Jeffrey A. Smith

Jeffrey A. Smith Millen, White, Zelano & Branigan, P.C.2200 Clarendon BoulevardSuite 1400Arlington, VA 22201

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
038Providing customers with Internet and telephone access to an application hub, namely, providing voice communication services via the Internet, Voice over internet protocol (VOIP) services that are accessed by phone or the internet which provides computer telephony integration whereby people who wish to communicate with the customer are put into contact via the application hub; providing customers with Internet and telephone access to an application hub, namely, providing voice communication services via the Internet, Voice over internet protocol (VOIP) services that are accessed by phone or the internet which enables person-to-person, business-to-business and customer-to-business contact in multiple media formats with applications also featuring call recording, telecommunications call routing, telephone conference services, video conferencing, video broadcasting, instant messaging, mobile telephone services and web conferencing services whereby people who wish to communicate with the customer are put into contact via the application hub; providing customers with Internet and telephone access to an application hub, namely, providing telephone communication services and voice communication services via the Internet which provides the processing facilities of a call or contact centre by hosted telephony by connecting calls between phone and internet voice calling usersACTIVE—
042Platform as a service (PAAS) featuring computer software platforms for contact center management, namely, computer software for call routing, integration into third-party customer relationship management platforms, organizing and displaying relevant data to contact center agent, call handling, communications analysis, interactive voice response, making and receiving calls, workforce management and employee recognition and gamificationACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 18, 2026NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Apr 23, 2026NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Jul 17, 2020FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Jul 2, 2020FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Jul 2, 2020FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Jul 2, 2019MAB1ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT—
Jul 2, 2019ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED—
Jul 1, 2019EXARTEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED—
May 17, 2019OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
May 1, 2019OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
May 1, 2019OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Feb 25, 2019GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Feb 25, 2019GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Feb 25, 2019CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Feb 21, 2019TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Feb 21, 2019CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 13, 2019ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
Aug 13, 2018GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Aug 13, 2018GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Aug 13, 2018CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jul 19, 2018TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jul 19, 2018CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 19, 2018ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jul 9, 2018TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jan 27, 2018RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Jan 9, 2018RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Jan 9, 2018RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Dec 16, 2017RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Dec 15, 2017CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 12, 2017MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Dec 8, 2017DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 8, 2017NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Nov 30, 2017REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance