USPTO serial 79222280
7 SEVEN NIGHTS TOBACCO
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- O'BRIEN, JENNIFER LYNN
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with 7 SEVEN NIGHTS TOBACCO?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Alex Patel
GREGORY KENYOTA PATEL & ALMEIDA PC16830 VENTURA BLVDSUITE 360ENCINO, CA 91436Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 034 | Hookah tobacco; hookahs; tobacco; tobacco jars; tobacco pouches; tobacco pipes; tobacco tins; raw tobacco; flavored tobacco; manufactured tobacco; electronic smoking pipes; Flavorings for tobacco, other than essential oils; tobacco pipes of precious metal; tobacco pipes, not of precious metal; flavorings, other than essential oils, for tobacco | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 10, 2020 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Mar 23, 2020 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 22, 2020 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| May 24, 2019 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| May 8, 2019 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| May 8, 2019 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 22, 2019 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Mar 22, 2019 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Mar 22, 2019 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Mar 22, 2019 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Aug 24, 2018 | RFNP | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Aug 9, 2018 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Aug 1, 2018 | OPNS | OPPOSITION NOTICE (IB REFUSAL) SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 1, 2018 | OPNC | OPPOSITION NOTICE (IB REFUSAL) CREATED | — |
| Apr 9, 2018 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 3, 2018 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 3, 2018 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 14, 2018 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 24, 2018 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 16, 2018 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Feb 16, 2018 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 16, 2018 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 16, 2018 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 3, 2018 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jan 26, 2018 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 25, 2018 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 25, 2018 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 18, 2018 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 18, 2018 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Jan 9, 2018 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Jan 8, 2018 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 30, 2017 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 19, 2017 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Dec 15, 2017 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Dec 13, 2017 | LIMI | LIMITATION FROM ORIGINAL APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Dec 7, 2017 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |