Drawing for GA GREEN APPLE HOME STYLE

USPTO serial 79222301

GA GREEN APPLE HOME STYLE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
LAWRENCE, SUSAN KASTRINER
Law office
TTAB

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 604: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with GA GREEN APPLE HOME STYLE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Nicholas D. Wells

NICHOLAS D WELLS LEGENDS LAW GROUP PLLC330 MAIN STKAYSVILLE, UT 84037UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
020Furniture, namely, tables, sideboards, cabinets, side tables, coffee tables, screens, beds, headboards, bedside tables, chests, drawers, dressers, mirrors; upholstered furniture, namely, chairs, sofas, armchairs, stools, chaise longues; office furniture, namely, desks, bookcasesABANDONED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 10, 2020FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Mar 20, 2020FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Mar 20, 2020FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Mar 20, 2019MAB4ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION—
Mar 20, 2019ABN4ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION—
Mar 20, 2019OP.TOPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999—
Mar 20, 2019OP.SOPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999—
Jan 5, 2019RFNPREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Dec 8, 2018OP.IOPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999—
Nov 29, 2018OPNSOPPOSITION NOTICE (IB REFUSAL) SENT TO IB—
Nov 29, 2018OPNCOPPOSITION NOTICE (IB REFUSAL) CREATED—
Aug 29, 2018ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED—
Jul 31, 2018NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Jul 31, 2018PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jul 27, 2018GPNXNOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB—
Jul 11, 2018OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Jul 11, 2018NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Jul 11, 2018OP2RNOTICE OF START OF OPPOSITION PERIOD CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Jun 26, 2018LOPRLETTER OF PROTEST EVIDENCE REVIEWED-NO FURTHER ACTION TAKEN—
Jun 26, 2018LOPTLETTER OF PROTEST EVIDENCE FORWARDED—
May 15, 2018PBCRWITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY—
May 2, 2018CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
May 1, 2018TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
May 1, 2018CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 27, 2018ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Apr 20, 2018TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jan 19, 2018RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Dec 27, 2017RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Dec 27, 2017RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Dec 13, 2017RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Dec 12, 2017CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 12, 2017MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Dec 8, 2017DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 8, 2017NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Dec 7, 2017REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance