Drawing for ACCURA

USPTO serial 79222328

ACCURA

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
MEYERS, MORGAN LAURA
Law office
LAW OFFICE 117 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 602: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with ACCURA?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Electronic publications; computer software; none of the aforesaid relating to financial administrationACTIVE—
035Market analysis; business data analysis; economic analysis pertaining to geographic locations, socio-economic and macro-economic analysis; business data and statistics analysis; creation of statistics; business consultancy; electronic data processing services; data analysis services; business data analysis, namely, data insights; business data analysis, namely, data science; data management services; commoditisation of data; provision of information and advisory services relating to the aforesaid; none of the aforementioned being legal services or other services ancillary to legal services for MandA transactionsACTIVE—
036Financial services; financial analysis; dissemination of financial information, financial information rendered by computer by means of a secure information computer network; verification of financial information; information services relating to the aforesaid services, including such services provided via the Internet; none of the aforementioned being legal services or other services ancillary to legal services for MandA transactionsACTIVE—
042Computer programming; computer software design and consultancy; installation, maintenance and updating of computer software; webportal design; rental of computer software; computer system design and analysis; data conversion of computer programs and data; development and testing of algorithms; data aggregation; data mining; provision of geographical information; electronic data storage services; information services relating to all of the aforesaid services, including such services provided via the Internet; none of the aforesaid relating to financial administrationACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 27, 2024NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Aug 30, 2019FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Aug 12, 2019FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Aug 10, 2019FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
May 24, 2019OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
May 8, 2019OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
May 8, 2019OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Aug 13, 2018MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Aug 10, 2018ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jun 13, 2018ATRVATTORNEY REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jun 13, 2018LIMELIMITATION FROM THE IB - REQUEST EXAM REVIEW—
Jun 8, 2018LIMGLIMITATION OF GOODS RECEIVED FROM IB—
Mar 30, 2018NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Jan 27, 2018RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Jan 7, 2018RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Jan 6, 2018RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Dec 18, 2017RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Dec 17, 2017CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 12, 2017MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Dec 8, 2017DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 8, 2017NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Dec 7, 2017REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance