Drawing for WAAH ORGANIC

USPTO serial 79222355

WAAH ORGANIC

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 5905648Status 709
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Nov 12, 2019
Examiner
FALK, JONATHAN ROBERT
Law office
PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with WAAH ORGANIC?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Josh Lignana

JOSH LIGNANA SPADEA LIGNANA LLC1315 WALNUT STREET SUITE 1532PHILADELPHIA, PA 19107UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
030Organic coffee, tea, cocoa, sugar, tapioca, sago, artificial coffeeSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 29, 2026C71TCANCELLED SECTION 71—
Nov 12, 2024REM3COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (6-YR) E-MAILED—
Oct 10, 2020FINPFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Mar 6, 2020XXSSGENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION SENT TO IB—
Mar 6, 2020XXCRGENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION CREATED—
Feb 12, 2020FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Nov 12, 2019R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Sep 6, 2019GPNXNOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB—
Aug 27, 2019NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Aug 27, 2019PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Aug 7, 2019OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Aug 7, 2019OP2RNOTICE OF START OF OPPOSITION PERIOD CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Aug 7, 2019NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Jul 20, 2019EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Jul 19, 2019CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jul 19, 2019XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Jul 19, 2019GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Jul 19, 2019GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Jul 19, 2019CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Jun 26, 2019EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Jun 26, 2019JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Jun 21, 2019NREVNOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED—
Jun 21, 2019EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Jun 21, 2019PGTTPETITION GRANTED - TTAB APPEAL FILED—
Jun 19, 2019APETASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF—
May 24, 2019OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
May 21, 2019EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
May 20, 2019TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 20, 2019PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
May 8, 2019OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
May 8, 2019OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Apr 26, 2019FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Mar 20, 2019MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Mar 20, 2019ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Aug 31, 2018GPNXNOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB—
Aug 16, 2018GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Aug 16, 2018GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Aug 16, 2018CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jul 26, 2018DPCCDIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Jul 26, 2018TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jul 26, 2018AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Jul 13, 2018ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jun 29, 2018DRRRDIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED—
Jun 29, 2018CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 29, 2018ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 29, 2018REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Jun 29, 2018TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jun 29, 2018TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 29, 2018ERTDTEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED—
Jan 19, 2018RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Dec 29, 2017RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Dec 29, 2017RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Dec 15, 2017RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Dec 14, 2017CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 12, 2017MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Dec 8, 2017DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 8, 2017NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Dec 7, 2017REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance