USPTO serial 79222543
SENDA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- WRIGHT, MARCO JABBAR
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 120 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with SENDA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | Jacks machines; fretsaw blades parts of machines; hand-held electric drills excluding electric coal drill; packing machines; saws machines; pneumatic nailers; spray guns for paint; hand-held hydraulic tools; electric wrenches; electric screwdrivers; electric hammers; hoist cranes; drilling bits parts of machines; saw blades parts of machines; hand-held tools, other than hand-operated; hand-held pneumatic tools | ACTIVE | — |
| 008 | Manicure sets; secateurs; gouges hand tools; cutting tools hand tools; glaziers' diamonds parts of hand tools; oyster openers; wire strippers hand tools; scissors; daggers; vices; garden tools, hand-operated; lifting jacks, hand-operated; manual inflator; hand-operated packing devices; frames for handsaws; spanners hand tools; penknives; pliers; bits hand tools; hammers hand tools; saws hand tools; spades hand tools; tweezers; tableware knives, forks and spoons; saw blades parts of hand tools; hand-operated peeling appliances and instruments of slaughtering animals; tap die hand tools; screwdriver | ACTIVE | — |
| 009 | Protection devices for personal use against accidents; fire escapes; protective helmets; rulers measuring instruments; goggles; weighing machines; measures; clothing for protection against accidents, irradiation and fire; asbestos gloves for protection against accidents; protective masks | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 5, 2021 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 23, 2019 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Aug 5, 2019 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 3, 2019 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 3, 2018 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 3, 2018 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 15, 2018 | CORN | CORRECTION FROM THE IB EXAMINED, NO ACTION IS NEEDED | — |
| Apr 27, 2018 | CRCV | CORRECTION TRANSACTION RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Jan 19, 2018 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Dec 28, 2017 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 28, 2017 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Dec 14, 2017 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Dec 13, 2017 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 13, 2017 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 13, 2017 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Dec 9, 2017 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 9, 2017 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Dec 7, 2017 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |