USPTO serial 79222742
FRONTIER
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- AGREDA, SAMANTHA LEIGH
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 123 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with FRONTIER?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Matthew A. Homyk
Matthew A. Homyk Blank Rome LLPOne Logan SquarePhiladelphia, PA 19103UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 043 | Youth hostels; accommodation bureau services, namely, making reservations and bookings for temporary lodging; accommodation and room booking services, namely, agency services for booking hotel accommodation; providing temporary housing accommodations through an accommodation letting agency which rents out rooms in a time share; animal boarding; arranging holiday accommodation, namely, reservation of hotel rooms for travelers; pet boarding kennel services; booking agency services for holiday and temporary accommodation, namely, providing travel lodging booking agency services for travelers; rental of portable buildings; creche services; day-care center services; emergency shelter services, namely, providing temporary housing; providing temporary accommodation, namely, guest house services; providing temporary holiday accommodation; holiday camp services; hotels, hostels and boarding houses; leasing of metal and non-metal portable buildings; rental of temporary accommodation; resort lodging services; nurseries, day care and elderly care facilities; operating membership accommodation in the nature of providing private residence club members temporary accommodations; pet day care services; pet hotel services; providing temporary accommodations at assisted living facilities; providing travel lodging information services via the Internet; providing temporary accommodation; provision of temporary lodgings being hostels and hotels; rental of furniture, linens, and table settings; making reservations and booking for temporary lodging, namely, services for reserving holiday and temporary accommodation; tourist accommodation, namely, inns; tourist hostels; youth hostel services; information, advisory and consultancy services relating to the aforesaid | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 6, 2025 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 7, 2020 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jan 23, 2020 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 23, 2020 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 12, 2019 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| May 31, 2019 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| May 15, 2019 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| May 15, 2019 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 23, 2019 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 23, 2019 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 9, 2018 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Jul 9, 2018 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 9, 2018 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 18, 2018 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 18, 2018 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 18, 2018 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 27, 2018 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jan 9, 2018 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 9, 2018 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Dec 20, 2017 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Dec 19, 2017 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 19, 2017 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Dec 15, 2017 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 15, 2017 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Dec 14, 2017 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |