Drawing for CHINA JIANYIN INVESTMENT

USPTO serial 79222747

CHINA JIANYIN INVESTMENT

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 5671905Status 709
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Feb 12, 2019
Examiner
MMEJE, OBIEZE GINIKANWA
Law office
PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with CHINA JIANYIN INVESTMENT?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Lawrence E. Abelman

Lawrence E. Abelman Abelman Frayne & Schwab666 Third Avenue10th FloorNEW YORK, NY 10017

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
036Financing services; financial consultancy; financial analysis; financial evaluation for insurance purposes; banking; real estate agency services; financial information; financial management; loans financing; investment brokerage; capital investment; investment of funds; debt collection agency services; fiscal valuation; issuance of tokens of value; business liquidation services, financial; deposits of valuables, namely, safe deposit box services; stock exchange quotations; financial clearing houses; insurance brokerage; insurance consultancy; jewelry appraisal; surety services; charitable fund raising; trusteeship representatives; fiduciary representatives; factoring agencies; securities lending; futures brokerageSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 29, 2026INTRTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
Aug 29, 2025C71TCANCELLED SECTION 71—
Feb 12, 2024REM3COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (6-YR) E-MAILED—
Mar 25, 2023NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Jun 21, 2019FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Jun 3, 2019FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Jun 3, 2019FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
May 12, 2019FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Feb 12, 2019R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Nov 27, 2018NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Nov 27, 2018PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Nov 24, 2018GPNXNOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB—
Nov 7, 2018OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Nov 7, 2018OP2RNOTICE OF START OF OPPOSITION PERIOD CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Nov 7, 2018NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Oct 25, 2018CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Oct 10, 2018TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Oct 10, 2018CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 26, 2018ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Sep 17, 2018NREVNOTICE OF REVIVAL - MAILED—
Sep 17, 2018TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Sep 17, 2018PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Sep 17, 2018PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Aug 14, 2018MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Aug 14, 2018ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Feb 16, 2018RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Jan 27, 2018RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Jan 27, 2018RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Jan 19, 2018RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Jan 18, 2018CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 10, 2018DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 19, 2017MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Dec 15, 2017NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Dec 14, 2017REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance