Drawing for BIG BUCK BUNNY

USPTO serial 79222789

BIG BUCK BUNNY

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
GILLES, DEBORAH LYNN MEINERS
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 110 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with BIG BUCK BUNNY?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Beate Boudro

Beate Boudro Beate Boudro, Attorney at Law4801 Lang Ave. NE, Suite 110Albuquerque, NM 87109UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Computer and video games software; Games software in particular for use on any computer platform, including electronic entertainment and games consoles; Computer game programs; Video game software; downloadable software in the nature of computer games provided through a global computer network or supplied by means of multi-media electronic broadcast or through telecommunications or electronic transmission or via the Internet; Computer game software, leisure and recreational software for playing betting games, video game software and computer software for playing games of chance, all being provided in the form of storage media; computer programs for operating electric and electronic apparatus for games, amusement and entertainment purposes; automatic lottery machines, namely, electronic terminal for an electronic lottery system which generates lottery tickets; computer software for playing computer games on the Internet; Online games in the nature of downloadable software, in particular for online betting games, online prize games, online gambling games, and online casino games; computer software in the form of an application for mobile devices and computers for playing casino and amusement arcade games; collection of video games, namely, video game software sold as a bundleACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 15, 2022ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB—
Nov 15, 2019FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Oct 25, 2019FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Oct 25, 2019FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
May 31, 2019OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
May 15, 2019OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
May 15, 2019OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Oct 25, 2018MAB1ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT—
Oct 25, 2018ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED—
Oct 24, 2018EXARTEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED—
Aug 5, 2018GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Aug 5, 2018GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Aug 5, 2018CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jul 14, 2018TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jul 13, 2018CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 13, 2018TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Feb 3, 2018RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Jan 18, 2018RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Jan 18, 2018RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Jan 9, 2018RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Jan 8, 2018CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 30, 2017DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 19, 2017MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Dec 15, 2017NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Dec 14, 2017REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance