Drawing for VIOROU BY SHINGO ONODERA

USPTO serial 79222822

VIOROU BY SHINGO ONODERA

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 5711849Status 739Registered
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Apr 2, 2019
Examiner
BIBB, SCOTT
Law office
Historical data usage

What this means

This trademark is registered with the USPTO. Monitoring new filings can help you catch lookalike marks early.

Need help with VIOROU BY SHINGO ONODERA?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Howard W. Kline

Howard W. Kline Nath, Goldberg & Meyer112 S. West StreetALEXANDRIA, VA 22314United States

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Spectacles, eyeglasses [ and goggles, namely, goggles for sports ] , parts and accessories for spectacles, namely, frames for spectacles and cases for spectaclesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 18, 2025NA75NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED—
Mar 18, 2025C75AREGISTERED - SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK.—
Mar 18, 2025APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Oct 29, 2024ES75TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED—
Apr 2, 2024REM3COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (6-YR) E-MAILED—
Oct 17, 2019CORRCORRECTION FROM IB ENTERED - NO REVIEW REQUIRED—
Aug 16, 2019FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Aug 9, 2019CRCVCORRECTION TRANSACTION RECEIVED FROM IB—
Jul 27, 2019FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Jul 27, 2019FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Jul 26, 2019NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Jul 2, 2019FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Apr 2, 2019R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Jan 25, 2019GPNXNOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB—
Jan 15, 2019NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Jan 15, 2019PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jan 9, 2019OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Jan 9, 2019OP2RNOTICE OF START OF OPPOSITION PERIOD CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Dec 26, 2018NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Dec 6, 2018CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Nov 20, 2018TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Nov 20, 2018CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 16, 2018ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Nov 5, 2018NREVNOTICE OF REVIVAL - MAILED—
Nov 5, 2018TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Nov 5, 2018PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Nov 5, 2018PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Oct 5, 2018MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Oct 4, 2018ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Mar 24, 2018RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Mar 5, 2018RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Mar 5, 2018RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Feb 27, 2018RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Feb 26, 2018CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 25, 2017DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 19, 2017MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Dec 15, 2017NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Dec 14, 2017REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance