USPTO serial 79222898
MINERAL AIR
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 5592515Status 739Registered
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Oct 30, 2018
- Examiner
- BAKER, JORDAN A
- Law office
- Historical data usage
What this means
This trademark is registered with the USPTO. Monitoring new filings can help you catch lookalike marks early.
Need help with MINERAL AIR?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Daniel M. Gurfinkel
Daniel M. Gurfinkel Dennemeyer & Associates, LLC230 W. Monroe St.Suite 2100Chicago, IL 60606Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | Cosmetics; non-medicated soaps and household detergents; dentifrices; false nails; false eyelashes; adhesives for affixing false eyelashes; breath freshening preparations; perfume and essential oils for flavoring food and beverages | ACTIVE | — |
| 011 | Electric beauty treatment apparatuses for household use, namely, electric facial steamers, facial saunas, nail drying machines, hair steamers, hair dryers; electric beauty treatment apparatuses for industrial purposes, namely, electric facial steamers, facial saunas, nail drying machines for beauty salons, hair steamers for beauty salon use, hair drying machines for beauty salon use, and combination hair dryers and chairs for use in beauty salons; household electric apparatuses for slimming purposes, namely, non-medical electric heating apparatus for slimming, which also measures body fat; industrial electric apparatuses for slimming purposes, namely, non-medical heating apparatus for slimming, which also measures body fat; facial equipment using ultrasonic waves for household purposes, namely, electronic facial sprayers; electric facial care devices for household purposes, namely, electronic facial sprayers; electric facial care devices for industrial purposes, namely, facial sterilizers, electronic facial steamers, and facial saunas; steam facial apparatus, namely, facial saunas; household electrothermic appliances, namely, hair dryers, electric footwarmers in the nature of footmuffs, Japanese electric leg-warming apparatus for household purposes (electric kotatsu); electric cosmetic foundation sprayers for household use; electric cosmetic lotion sprayers for household use | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 11, 2025 | NA75 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 11, 2025 | C75A | REGISTERED - SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Mar 11, 2025 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Oct 22, 2024 | ES75 | TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 30, 2023 | REM3 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 23, 2021 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 1, 2019 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Feb 11, 2019 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 11, 2019 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Feb 11, 2019 | LIMN | LIMITATION FROM THE IB EXAMINED, NO ACTION IS NEEDED | — |
| Feb 1, 2019 | LIMG | LIMITATION OF GOODS RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Jan 30, 2019 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 30, 2018 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Aug 14, 2018 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 14, 2018 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 11, 2018 | GPNX | NOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jul 25, 2018 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 25, 2018 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 25, 2018 | OP2R | NOTICE OF START OF OPPOSITION PERIOD CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 9, 2018 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 6, 2018 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 6, 2018 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 6, 2018 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 14, 2018 | GPRN | NOTIFICATION OF PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Jun 14, 2018 | GPRA | PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Jun 14, 2018 | CPRA | PRIORITY ACTION WRITTEN | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Jun 12, 2018 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 11, 2018 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Jun 8, 2018 | GPNX | NOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| May 30, 2018 | PBCR | WITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY | — |
| May 23, 2018 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| May 23, 2018 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| May 23, 2018 | OP2R | NOTICE OF START OF OPPOSITION PERIOD CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| May 4, 2018 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 3, 2018 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 3, 2018 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 3, 2018 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 10, 2018 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Apr 10, 2018 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 10, 2018 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 15, 2018 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 15, 2018 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 15, 2018 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 15, 2018 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 3, 2018 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jan 18, 2018 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 18, 2018 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Jan 5, 2018 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Jan 4, 2018 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 3, 2018 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 19, 2017 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Dec 15, 2017 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Dec 14, 2017 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |