USPTO serial 79223355
DIAMANT VOGUE CLASSIQUE CLASSE EST UN AVANTAGE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- VO, JULIE
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with DIAMANT VOGUE CLASSIQUE CLASSE EST UN AVANTAGE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Vivian Ortiz-Ponce
KONRAD SUSZCZYNSKI-RODRIGUEZKSIECIA JOZEFA 291PL 30 243 CRACOW,POLANDGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 032 | Non-alcoholic beverages flavored with coffee; Non-alcoholic beverages flavored with tea; Non-alcoholic beverages flavored with fruit juices; Non-alcoholic beverages flavored with aloe vera; Non-alcoholic beverages flavored with coconut; beer and beer-based beverages in the nature of coolers and cocktails; preparations for making beverages, namely, fruit drinks, energy drinks, sports drinks | ABANDONED | — |
| 033 | Alcoholic beverages except beers; preparations for making alcoholic beverages except beers | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Konrad Suszczynski-Rodriguez
- Other trademarks owned by Konrad Suszczynski-Rodriguez
- Other trademarks in Class 032
- Other trademarks in Class 033
- Similar marks named DIAMANT VOGUE CLASSIQUE CLASSE EST UN AVANTAGE
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 28, 2020 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Nov 12, 2020 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 12, 2020 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 12, 2019 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Nov 12, 2019 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Nov 12, 2019 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Nov 12, 2019 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jun 7, 2019 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| May 22, 2019 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| May 22, 2019 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 23, 2018 | RFNP | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jun 4, 2018 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| May 21, 2018 | OPNS | OPPOSITION NOTICE (IB REFUSAL) SENT TO IB | — |
| May 19, 2018 | OPNC | OPPOSITION NOTICE (IB REFUSAL) CREATED | — |
| Apr 16, 2018 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 3, 2018 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 3, 2018 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 14, 2018 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 26, 2018 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 24, 2018 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Feb 13, 2018 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 13, 2018 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 13, 2018 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 12, 2018 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 12, 2018 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 7, 2018 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 7, 2018 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Feb 4, 2018 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Feb 3, 2018 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 26, 2018 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 30, 2017 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Dec 26, 2017 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Dec 21, 2017 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |