Drawing for OSPW SYSTEM

USPTO serial 79223616

OSPW SYSTEM

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 5472334Status 739Registered
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
May 22, 2018
Examiner
TURNER, JASON FITZGERALD
Law office
Historical data usage

What this means

This trademark is registered with the USPTO. Monitoring new filings can help you catch lookalike marks early.

Need help with OSPW SYSTEM?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Eric T. Fingerhut

Eric T. Fingerhut Dykema Gossett PLLC1301 K Street, N.W., Suite 1100 WestWashington, DC 20005United States

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
007Pulleys, namely, pulley wheels being parts of machines not for land vehicles; bearings, namely, ceramic bearings as machine parts; roller bearings for machines; anti-friction roller bearings for machines; ball bearings for motors; axial ball bearings as parts of machinesACTIVE—
012Parts and fittings for land vehicles, namely, pulley wheels and anti-friction bearings for bicycles; ball bearings for land vehicles, namely, ceramic bearings; axle ball bearings for land vehicles; pulley wheels for land vehicles; bicycles; parts of bicycles, namely, gears for bicycles; bicycle construction parts, [ namely, forks, handle bar stems, brakes; ] bicycle wheels; [ bicycle chains; ] bicycle parts, namely, bottom brackets; gear wheels for bicycles; rear derailleursACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 19, 2026INNPPARTIAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB—
Jan 30, 2026INPSPARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB—
Jan 30, 2026INPCINVALIDATION PROCESSED—
Aug 9, 2025INPRPARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
Dec 9, 2024NA75NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED—
Dec 9, 2024C75AREGISTERED - SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK.—
Dec 2, 2024APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Apr 26, 2024ES75TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED—
Sep 21, 2018FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Aug 30, 2018FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Aug 30, 2018FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Aug 22, 2018FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
May 22, 2018R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Mar 6, 2018NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Mar 6, 2018PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Feb 14, 2018NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Feb 3, 2018RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Jan 23, 2018CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jan 22, 2018TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jan 22, 2018CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 22, 2018TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jan 13, 2018RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Jan 13, 2018RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Dec 30, 2017MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Dec 27, 2017RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Dec 26, 2017CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 26, 2017DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 26, 2017NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Dec 21, 2017REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance