Drawing for PHYTOFY

USPTO serial 79223780

PHYTOFY

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 5598089Status 739Registered
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Nov 6, 2018
Examiner
DUONG, ANGELA GAW
Law office
Historical data usage

What this means

This trademark is registered with the USPTO. Monitoring new filings can help you catch lookalike marks early.

Need help with PHYTOFY?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Alison M. Caless

Alison M. Caless Cantor Colburn LLP20 Church Street22nd FloorHartford, CT 06103

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
011Lighting apparatus, namely, electric lamps and luminaires; LED lamps and LED luminaires and their parts, namely, LED lighting fixtures, LED lamps, LED operated lighting devices, LED operated lighting apparatus in the nature of lighting installations; lighting lamps and lighting apparatus and facilities and systems consisting thereof as well as their parts on basis of LED, namely, LED lighting fixtures, LED lamps, LED operated lighting devices, LED operated lighting apparatus in the nature of lighting installations; modules for LED lighting systems, namely, modules based on LEDs [ , also organic LEDs with light functions and for lighting applications ]ACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 26, 2026INNPPARTIAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB—
Jan 30, 2026INPSPARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB—
Jan 30, 2026INPCINVALIDATION PROCESSED—
Oct 10, 2025NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Aug 9, 2025INPRPARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
May 2, 2025NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Mar 21, 2025ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB—
Dec 9, 2024NA75NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED—
Dec 9, 2024C75AREGISTERED - SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK.—
Nov 30, 2024APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
May 19, 2024NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Apr 18, 2024ES75TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED—
Nov 6, 2023REM3COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (6-YR) E-MAILED—
Mar 1, 2019FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Feb 12, 2019FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Feb 12, 2019FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Feb 6, 2019FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Nov 6, 2018R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Aug 21, 2018NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Aug 21, 2018PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Aug 17, 2018GPNXNOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB—
Aug 1, 2018OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Aug 1, 2018NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Aug 1, 2018OP2RNOTICE OF START OF OPPOSITION PERIOD CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Jul 9, 2018CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jul 7, 2018TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jul 6, 2018CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 6, 2018TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 15, 2018GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 15, 2018GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 15, 2018CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 30, 2018GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Mar 30, 2018GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Mar 30, 2018CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Mar 10, 2018TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Mar 9, 2018CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 9, 2018TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Feb 10, 2018RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Jan 22, 2018RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Jan 22, 2018RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Jan 12, 2018RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Jan 11, 2018CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 6, 2018MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Jan 2, 2018DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 2, 2018NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Dec 29, 2017LIMILIMITATION FROM ORIGINAL APPLICATION ENTERED—
Dec 28, 2017REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance