USPTO serial 79224204
NATURE'S ENERGY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CROWLEY, SEAN MICHAEL
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with NATURE'S ENERGY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Anthony D. Logan
ANTHONY D LOGAN VENJURIS PC1938 E OSBORN RDPHOENIX, AZ 85016UNITED STATESGoods and services
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 8, 2025 | DENC | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 8, 2025 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Jul 3, 2020 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jun 15, 2020 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 14, 2020 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 21, 2019 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jun 14, 2019 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Jun 14, 2019 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jun 14, 2019 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jun 14, 2019 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Jun 14, 2019 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jun 14, 2019 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jun 5, 2019 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 5, 2019 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 21, 2018 | RFNP | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Nov 29, 2018 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Nov 27, 2018 | OPNS | OPPOSITION NOTICE (IB REFUSAL) SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 27, 2018 | OPNC | OPPOSITION NOTICE (IB REFUSAL) CREATED | — |
| Nov 16, 2018 | RFNP | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Nov 1, 2018 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Oct 23, 2018 | OPNS | OPPOSITION NOTICE (IB REFUSAL) SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 23, 2018 | OPNC | OPPOSITION NOTICE (IB REFUSAL) CREATED | — |
| Jul 9, 2018 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 26, 2018 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 26, 2018 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 6, 2018 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| May 23, 2018 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 23, 2018 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| May 23, 2018 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| May 23, 2018 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| May 23, 2018 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 9, 2018 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 9, 2018 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 6, 2018 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 26, 2018 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 10, 2018 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jan 25, 2018 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 25, 2018 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Jan 18, 2018 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Jan 17, 2018 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 13, 2018 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Jan 9, 2018 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 9, 2018 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jan 4, 2018 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |