USPTO serial 79224230
K KING ENGINE BEARING SPECIALISTS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MCBRIDE, CAMERON L
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 106 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with K KING ENGINE BEARING SPECIALISTS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | Machines and machine tools for treatment of materials and for manufacturing; motors, other than for land vehicles; machine clutches and transmissions, other than for land vehicles; components and parts for machine clutches and transmissions, other than for land vehicles; agricultural implements, other than hand-operated; electric motors, hydraulic engines and motors, powertrains and machine parts; bearings and bushes (parts of machines); engine bearings; ball-bearings; plain thrust bearings; camshafts; camshafts for vehicle engines; housings (parts of machines) | ACTIVE | — |
| 012 | Automobile engines; bushes for vehicles; vehicle shock absorbers; transmission shafts for land vehicles; clutches for land vehicles; automobile chains; steering wheels for vehicles; brakes for vehicles; brakes for vehicles, including brakes for land vehicles; structural parts for automobiles; treads for vehicles (roller belts); powertrains, including engines and motors, for land vehicles; freewheels for land vehicles; discs for clutch thrust bearings of land vehicles; anti-theft devices for vehicles; anti-theft alarms for vehicles | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 13, 2019 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Aug 26, 2019 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 24, 2019 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 21, 2019 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jun 5, 2019 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 5, 2019 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 24, 2018 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 24, 2018 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 26, 2018 | CHLD | CHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Feb 10, 2018 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jan 24, 2018 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 24, 2018 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Jan 17, 2018 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Jan 16, 2018 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 13, 2018 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Jan 9, 2018 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 9, 2018 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jan 4, 2018 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |