Drawing for INVIVOTECH

USPTO serial 79224568

INVIVOTECH

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 5527089Status 709
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Jul 31, 2018
Examiner
SETTLES LEWIS, SHAILA E
Law office
PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with INVIVOTECH?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

M. David Galin

M. David Galin Tucker Ellis LLP950 Main AvenueSuite 1100Cleveland, OH 44113

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
041Education services, namely courses in the field of surgical simulation ; Medical training and medical education in the nature of courses in the field of medicine; training in the field of surgical simulation; publication of scientific articles on medical technologySECTION 71 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 7, 2026INNTTOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB—
Apr 15, 2026INTSTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB—
Apr 15, 2026INPCINVALIDATION PROCESSED—
Oct 14, 2025INTRTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
Feb 14, 2025C71TCANCELLED SECTION 71—
Aug 23, 2024CHLDCHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB—
Jul 19, 2024NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Jul 3, 2024TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jul 3, 2024ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jul 3, 2024REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Jul 3, 2024CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED—
Jul 3, 2024COARTEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED—
Nov 1, 2021NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Dec 7, 2018FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Nov 17, 2018FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Nov 17, 2018FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Oct 31, 2018FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Jul 31, 2018R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
May 15, 2018PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Apr 25, 2018NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Apr 11, 2018CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Mar 27, 2018TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Mar 27, 2018CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 27, 2018TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 26, 2018TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Mar 26, 2018CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 26, 2018TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Feb 16, 2018RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Feb 1, 2018RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Feb 1, 2018RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Jan 26, 2018RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Jan 25, 2018CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 24, 2018DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 16, 2018MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Jan 10, 2018NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Jan 4, 2018REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance