Drawing for SURETAP

USPTO serial 79224605

SURETAP

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 5847485Status 709
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Sep 3, 2019
Examiner
STEDMAN, CORI
Law office
PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with SURETAP?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Seth M. Reiss

Seth M. Reiss SETH M REISS, AAL ALLLC3770 Lurline DriveHonolulu, HI 96816UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
007Machine tools for metal work and cutting holes in pipelines and pressure vessels, excluding hand tools; cutting machines excluding hand tools; machine tools for drilling holes in pipelines and pressure vessels, excluding hand toolsSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—
037Maintenance and repair of machine tools for metal work and cutting holes in pipelines and pressure vessels, excluding hand tools; maintenance and repair of cutting machines excluding hand tools; Rental of machine tools for drilling holes in pipelines and pressure vessels, excluding hand tools, all solely for construction, installation, maintenance or repair purposesSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 20, 2026C71TCANCELLED SECTION 71—
Sep 3, 2024REM3COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (6-YR) E-MAILED—
Jan 24, 2020FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Jan 4, 2020FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Jan 3, 2020FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Dec 3, 2019FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Sep 3, 2019R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Jun 21, 2019OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Jun 18, 2019NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Jun 18, 2019PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jun 14, 2019GPNXNOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB—
Jun 5, 2019OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Jun 5, 2019OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
May 29, 2019OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
May 29, 2019NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
May 29, 2019OP2RNOTICE OF START OF OPPOSITION PERIOD CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
May 16, 2019PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
May 16, 2019ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
May 2, 2019CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Apr 3, 2019TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Apr 2, 2019CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 2, 2019TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Oct 2, 2018GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 2, 2018GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 2, 2018CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 19, 2018TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jul 18, 2018CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 18, 2018TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Feb 10, 2018RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Jan 22, 2018RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Jan 22, 2018RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Jan 16, 2018MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Jan 11, 2018RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Jan 10, 2018CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 10, 2018DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 10, 2018NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Jan 4, 2018REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance