Drawing for SOLIDATUS

USPTO serial 79224698

SOLIDATUS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 5663372Status 739Registered
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Jan 29, 2019
Examiner
PARKS, KIMBERLY L
Law office
Historical data usage

What this means

This trademark is registered with the USPTO. Monitoring new filings can help you catch lookalike marks early.

Need help with SOLIDATUS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Nicholas D. Wells

Nicholas D. Wells Legends Law Group, PLLC330 Main St.Kaysville, UT 84037United States

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Computer software for tracing data lineage; software for tracking data lineage; computer software for tracing meta-data lineage; software for tracking meta-data lineage; computer data management software; computer software for the discovery, maintenance, tracing, tracking, control, governance and visualisation of data lineage, data glossaries and data dictionaries; computer software for the discovery, maintenance, tracing, tracking, control, governance and visualisation of meta-data lineage, meta-data glossaries and meta-data dictionariesACTIVE—
042Software design and development; research, development, design and upgrading of computer software; preparation, update, installation and maintenance of computer software; computer software design for others; writing and updating computer software; maintenance of computer software; computer software development in the field of tracking data lineage; software development in the field of tracking data lineage; computer software development in the field of governance of data lineage; software development in the field of governance of data lineage; computer software development in the field of control of data lineage; software development in the field of control of data lineage; computer software development in the field of tracking meta-data lineage; software development in the field of tracking meta-data lineage; computer software development in the field of governance of meta-data lineage; software development in the field of governance of meta-data lineage; computer software development in the field of control of meta-data lineage; software development in the field of control of meta-data lineage; business technology software consultation services; computer software consultancyACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 4, 2025NA75NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED—
Dec 4, 2025C75AREGISTERED - SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK.—
Nov 17, 2025APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Jul 18, 2025ES75TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED—
Dec 31, 2021CHLDCHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB—
Jun 14, 2019FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
May 28, 2019FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
May 28, 2019FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Apr 29, 2019FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Jan 29, 2019R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Nov 13, 2018PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Nov 9, 2018GPNXNOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB—
Oct 24, 2018OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Oct 24, 2018OP2RNOTICE OF START OF OPPOSITION PERIOD CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Oct 24, 2018NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Oct 4, 2018CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED—
Oct 4, 2018CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Oct 4, 2018XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Oct 4, 2018CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Mar 24, 2018RFNPREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Mar 8, 2018RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Mar 8, 2018RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Mar 2, 2018RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Mar 1, 2018CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 28, 2018DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 16, 2018MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Jan 12, 2018NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Jan 4, 2018REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance