USPTO serial 79224912
THE SNAFFLING PIG CO
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- ERVIN, INGA
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 111 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with THE SNAFFLING PIG CO?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | Bacon; bacon bits; bacon rinds; meat, fish, poultry and game; packaged meats; pork; pork cutlets; pork loin; pork preserves; potato chips; potato crisps; sausage meat; sausages; bacon; bacon bits; bacon rinds; meat, fish, poultry and game; packaged meats; pork; pork cutlets; pork loin; pork preserves; potato chips; potato crisps; prepared dishes consisting principally of meat; prepared meals containing principally bacon; prepared meals made from meat meat predominating; prepared meat dishes; prepared meat; puffed pork rind; sausage meat; sausages | ACTIVE | — |
| 030 | Condiments; condiments in powder form; pies containing meat; pies (meat -); prepared foodstuffs in the form of sauces; prepared meals in the form of pizzas; sauce mixes; sauce powder; sauce powders; sauces; sauces condiments; sauces for barbecued meat; sausage rolls; savory food flavourings for food other than essential oils; savory pastries; seasoned coating for meat, fish, poultry; seasoned salt for cooking; seasoning mixes; seasonings | ACTIVE | — |
| 043 | Fast-food restaurants; pubs; restaurants; serving food and drinks; temporary accommodation | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 11, 2019 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Sep 20, 2019 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 20, 2019 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 28, 2019 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jun 12, 2019 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 12, 2019 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 20, 2018 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 20, 2018 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 24, 2018 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Mar 5, 2018 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 5, 2018 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Feb 24, 2018 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Feb 23, 2018 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 23, 2018 | RFWR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) WITHDRAWN FOR REVIEW | — |
| Feb 15, 2018 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Feb 14, 2018 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 9, 2018 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 23, 2018 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Jan 17, 2018 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jan 11, 2018 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |