Drawing for VARIABLE DYNAMIC DAMPER

USPTO serial 79225150

VARIABLE DYNAMIC DAMPER

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
MCMORROW, JANICE LEE
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 115 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 602: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with VARIABLE DYNAMIC DAMPER?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Jeffrey L. Costellia

Jeffrey L. Costellia Nixon Peabody LLP799 9th Street NWSuite 500Washington, DC 20001

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
012fluid couplings machine elements for land vehicles; hydraulic torque converters machine elements for land vehicles; torque converters for land vehiclesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 17, 2020FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Mar 30, 2020FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Mar 29, 2020FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Jul 5, 2019OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Jun 19, 2019OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Jun 19, 2019OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Mar 29, 2019MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Mar 29, 2019ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Nov 15, 2018NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Aug 31, 2018GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 31, 2018GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 31, 2018CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 13, 2018DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 8, 2018TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Aug 7, 2018CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 7, 2018TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 9, 2018ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 9, 2018REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Feb 24, 2018RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Feb 8, 2018RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Feb 8, 2018RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Feb 6, 2018RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Feb 5, 2018CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 25, 2018DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 23, 2018MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Jan 19, 2018NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Jan 18, 2018REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance