Drawing for HILUKE

USPTO serial 79225190

HILUKE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 402
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
HAN, DAWN L
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 107 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with HILUKE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
006Locks of metal for bags; alloys of common metal; pipework of metal; doors of metal; pegs of metal; hinges of metal; ironmongery; hardware of metal; safes strong boxes; springs metal hardware; works of art of common metalSECTION 70 - CANCELLED
009Locks, electric; fingerprint locks; peepholes magnifying lenses for doors; electric door bells; smart cards integrated circuit cards; wires, electric; integrated circuits; batteries, electric; remote control apparatus; video telephonesSECTION 70 - CANCELLED

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 25, 2025DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION
Nov 15, 2019FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB
Oct 28, 2019FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB
Oct 26, 2019FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Jul 5, 2019OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB
Jun 19, 2019OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB
Jun 19, 2019OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Oct 26, 2018MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Oct 26, 2018ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Mar 30, 2018RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB
Mar 15, 2018RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB
Mar 15, 2018RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU
Mar 9, 2018RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW
Mar 8, 2018CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 5, 2018DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Jan 23, 2018MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED
Jan 19, 2018NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED
Jan 18, 2018SDRCSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A SUBSEQ DESIG FROM IB

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance