Drawing for BEAMCOMPLEX

USPTO serial 79225321

BEAMCOMPLEX

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 5624787Status 709
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Dec 11, 2018
Examiner
BLAZICH, JOAN MICHELE
Law office
PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with BEAMCOMPLEX?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Teresa Segalman

Teresa Segalman Patent Hatchery LLC7 Clifton CtPikesville, MD 21208UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
011Disinfectant apparatus, namely, sterilizers not for medical purposes; ionization apparatus for the treatment of air or water, not for medical purposes; germicidal lamps for purifying air; clean chambers being sanitary installations, namely, clean room installations; apparatus for dehydrating food waste; water filtering apparatus; air purifying apparatus and machines; cooking apparatus and installations, namely, cooking ovens; sterilizers; water sterilizers; air sterilizers; sterilizers for household purposes; sterilizers for medical purposes; sterilizers for processing grain crops; sterilizers for industrial purposes; air filtering installations; filters for air conditioningSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—
037Disinfecting; sterilization of medical instruments; sterilization of food productsSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 27, 2026INTRTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
Feb 27, 2026INTRTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
Jun 27, 2025C71TCANCELLED SECTION 71—
Dec 11, 2023REM3COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (6-YR) E-MAILED—
May 10, 2019FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Mar 19, 2019XXSSGENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION SENT TO IB—
Mar 19, 2019XXCRGENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION CREATED—
Mar 11, 2019FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Dec 11, 2018R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Sep 25, 2018NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Sep 25, 2018PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Sep 21, 2018GPNXNOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB—
Sep 5, 2018OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Sep 5, 2018NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Sep 5, 2018OP2RNOTICE OF START OF OPPOSITION PERIOD CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Aug 21, 2018ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Aug 9, 2018CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Aug 2, 2018ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Aug 2, 2018REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Aug 2, 2018TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Aug 2, 2018CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 2, 2018TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Feb 24, 2018RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Feb 7, 2018RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Feb 7, 2018RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Feb 3, 2018RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Feb 2, 2018CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 30, 2018MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Jan 26, 2018DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 26, 2018NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Jan 25, 2018REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance